Hey Clief Notes Community! Jake built this community on one premise: skills over agents. I just wrote a paper proving why he's right. The paper is called "The AI Skill Gap Isn't About AI: The Case for Language Arts as the Foundation of Generative AI Interaction & Engagement," and the argument is simple: The tools don't determine output quality. The human operating them does. Specifically: their ability to think clearly, structure that thinking into language, and communicate it precisely enough that the model can actually work with it. That's not a prompting skill. That's a Language Arts skill. I built a framework around it, seven layers from Structured Thought at the core to Adaptive Transfer at the outer edge, and grounded it in 67 empirical studies. If you're here, you already know the human is the variable. This is the research that says it out loud. This is the thinking and application that landed me TWO promotions in my day job and has generated mass interest in the education industry in my consulting endeavors. Would love to hear how this maps to what you're seeing in your own AI environments.