Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Acquisition Operator Network

13 members • Free

39 contributions to Acquisition Operator Network
Recurring Revenue? Not All Recurring Is Durable.
A seller said the business had strong recurring revenue. The buyer liked that phrase. Everyone likes that phrase. Then we reviewed the contracts. Some customers were technically recurring but could cancel with 30 days’ notice. Some had not signed updated agreements in years. Some were loyal because of the seller personally. Some were recurring only because nobody had tried to raise prices. That is not the same as durable recurring revenue. Recurring revenue has layers. Contractual. Behavioral. Relationship-based. Mission-critical. Price-insensitive. Transferable. A buyer should not simply ask, “Is the revenue recurring?” A buyer should ask, “Why does it recur, what would cause it to stop, and will it still recur when the seller is gone?” That is where the truth is.
Recurring Revenue? Not All Recurring Is Durable.
2 likes • 3d
Recurring revenue sounds amazing right up until you realize half the customers can leave with a 30 day email and the other half only stay because they like the owner personally. Definitely changes how I think about what recurring actually means.
He Won The Price. He Lost The Deal
A buyer was proud that he negotiated the price down by $100,000. Then he gave it all back in structure. No working capital floor. Weak transition support. No inventory adjustment. No seller note. No meaningful indemnity. No customer retention protection. He won the visible negotiation and lost the invisible one. That happens often. Purchase price is emotionally satisfying because everyone can see it. Structure is quieter. But structure is where risk lives. A $100,000 price reduction means very little if the buyer inherits a $150,000 working capital gap, loses key employees, or has to replace equipment immediately after closing. Good dealmakers do not ask, “Did we lower the price?” They ask, “Did we improve the risk-adjusted outcome?” Those are not the same question.
He Won The Price. He Lost The Deal
2 likes • 4d
Structure is where operators protect optionality. A strong structure gives you leverage post-close, flexibility if things change, and real downside protection. Negotiate the deal you want to live with for the the next 7 - 10 years.
EVERYONE WANTED TO MOVE FAST. THAT WAS THE RISK.
The buyer wanted to move quickly. The seller wanted to move quickly. The broker wanted to move quickly. That was the problem. Speed feels good when everyone wants the same outcome. But speed can become pressure. One buyer almost signed an LOI without defining working capital, training period, inventory treatment, financing contingency, or exclusivity obligations. The deal felt simple because the parties liked each other. Liking each other is not a substitute for clarity. The best time to define hard terms is when everyone is still cooperative. Once money is spent, lawyers are involved, lenders are waiting, and closing fatigue sets in, every undefined term becomes more expensive. Slow down before the LOI. Speed up after the terms are clear. That is the rhythm. A rushed LOI does not save time. It usually borrows conflict from the future.
EVERYONE WANTED TO MOVE FAST. THAT WAS THE RISK.
1 like • 5d
The distinction between momentum and clarity. Early cooperation can create a false sense that alignment on outcome means alignment on structure, but those are very different things. This is a strong reminder that the LOI is not just about getting the deal moving, it is where future friction is often prevented.
The Annuals Look Stable. The Calendar Tells the Truth.
The buyer asked for three years of financials. The seller sent them. Revenue was steady. Profit was steady. Everything looked boring, which can be beautiful. Then the buyer asked for monthly financials. That changed the story. The business made nearly all its money in four months. The remaining eight months were thin. On an annual basis, it looked stable. On a monthly basis, it required cash discipline and seasonal reserves. The deal was still interesting. But the financing structure had to change. Monthly financials show what annual statements hide. They reveal seasonality, cash crunches, expense timing, and whether the business can support debt throughout the year. This is why annual EBITDA can be misleading. Debt service is monthly. Payroll is weekly or biweekly. Vendors do not wait for your good quarter. Operators do not buy annual averages. They buy the calendar
The Annuals Look Stable. The Calendar Tells the Truth.
2 likes • 6d
What I appreciate here is how this shifts financial review from profitability alone to survivability. A business may absolutely be profitable on paper, but if cash flow timing creates pressure for most of the year, that changes everything about structure, leverage, and reserve strategy. It really reinforces that financing should match operational cadence, not just annual totals.
The Acquisition Sounded Perfect....Then Reality Hit
Understanding how to buy a business requires careful due diligence, especially when considering a small business acquisition with owner finance options. This video examines a particular deal, emphasizing the importance of scrutinizing financial statements and projected cash flow to ensure a sound investment. It highlights how thorough...more
1 like • 6d
This post highlights something subtle but important: disappointment in deals often comes less from deception and more from incomplete interpretation. Sometimes buyers are not misled by false information, they are misled by insufficient context. That distinction matters because it reinforces how much responsibility sits with the buyer to pressure test every attractive assumption before it becomes underwriting.
1-10 of 39
Kevin McGee
3
40points to level up
@kevin-mcgee-7313
Looking to escape the corporate world and set my own future. Acquiring businesses truly resonates with me.

Active 3d ago
Joined Mar 9, 2026