Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

TTX - Cicchinelli Brothers

991 members • Free

Entrepreneur to Author

266 members • Free

Field & Frame🦉

333 members • Free

The Freedom Fellowship

559 members • $49/month

School of Happiness

283 members • Free

Becoming Her

589 members • Free

Accessible Astrology

952 members • Free

The Affiliate Profit Lab

267 members • Free

Skool IL

934 members • Free

3 contributions to Entrepreneur to Author
Why Most Manuscripts Don’t Fail at Grammar — They Fail at Structure
I’ve been studying modern developmental editing frameworks lately, and I’ve realized something powerful: most books don’t struggle because of bad writing… they struggle because of weak story architecture. Over the past few weeks, I’ve been diving deep into structural editing — not just line edits or grammar fixes, but the underlying frameworks that shape strong narratives. What stood out to me is how many successful stories follow certain structural principles, even when the author doesn’t consciously realize it. For example, the Three-Act Structure breaks a story into setup, confrontation, and resolution making sure tension builds properly and the climax actually earns its place. Freytag’s Pyramid focuses on rising action and emotional escalation, ensuring the turning point truly shifts the narrative. The Fichtean Curve removes slow exposition and jumps straight into conflict which is why it works so well in thrillers and fast-paced fiction. The Seven-Point Story Structure strengthens midpoints and turning points, especially helpful when a story feels like it “sags” in the middle. The Hero’s Journey emphasizes transformation not just what happens externally, but how the protagonist changes internally. And Dan Harmon’s Story Circle simplifies that transformation into a clean emotional loop: comfort, disruption, struggle, change. What I’ve learned is this: strong books aren’t just written — they’re architected. When pacing feels off, when the climax feels flat, when readers say “something’s missing,” it’s often a structural issue rather than a sentence-level problem. It’s been fascinating to see how applying these frameworks can clarify theme, deepen character arcs, and strengthen emotional payoff without altering the author’s voice. Curious how many of you consciously think about structure when drafting? Or do you write intuitively and revise later?
0 likes • 11d
I need beginners for my new projects. ‎ ‎1: Translation ‎2: Data Entry ‎3: Video Editing ‎ ‎If you're available kindly message me on telegram ( @KennethMl )
Is your manuscript ready for its close-up?
Hey everyone! I’m working with a scout group currently sourcing fresh material for the 2026 production season. We are specifically looking for compelling books to pitch to film and TV producers who are hungry for new stories. ​If you’ve ever visualized your characters on screen, this is the bridge to get them there. We’re looking for "page-turners" that translate into "must-watch" TV. ​Want to see if your story fits? Let’s chat this week. Drop a comment or DM me if you're ready to take your work beyond the page
0 likes • 11d
I need beginners for my new projects. ‎ ‎1: Translation ‎2: Data Entry ‎3: Video Editing ‎ ‎If you're available kindly message me on telegram ( @KennethMl )
Remote
I need beginners for my new projects. ‎ ‎1: Translation ‎2: Data Entry ‎3: Video Editing ‎ ‎If you're available kindly message me on telegram ( @KennethMl )
0
0
1-3 of 3
Kenneth Kent
2
10points to level up
@kennetg-mikes-1550
Part-time jobs available

Online now
Joined Dec 1, 2025