Hey all - This is my personal website, 100% built with Claude Code and QAed with Codex. Anyone can do this :) Check it out. I’d be happy to answer any questions https://kenashe.ai/

Here's the website I built for my brand. If you want to see the full website, you can access it here - https://visionfrontai.com/. The website creation process in Claude Code was pretty straightforward. Followed everything from Nate's explainer video; it got created in a jiffy. The real challenge I faced was hosting this fully functional website with multiple pages. Claude suggested me to create this on the Next.js framework. I was able to create separate pages for my Services, About, and Contact sections. After some research, I decided to bypass Vercel. Since I already had a domain in Hostinger, I upgraded to Node.js hosting in Hostinger. It connects directly to GitHub and runs the website. After a few errors, I managed to get the website running. On to the next challenge now!

I spent 100 hours testing Claude Code vs ChatGPT Codex and what I found genuinely surprised me. Same prompts, same builds, both tools side by side, and one of them hit way harder than I expected. If you're picking between coding agents right now, then this video is the breakdown you actually need before you commit.

Every new YouTuber thinks they sound awkward on camera. But the real problem isn’t confidence. It’s that human speech is insanely unpredictable. Your brain constantly tracks pauses, tone shifts, pacing, emphasis, breathing, awkward breaks… and the second those disappear, a voice starts feeling fake. That’s why most AI voiceovers still sound robotic. Not because the tools are bad. The AI voice industry is already worth billions. The problem is how people use them. Most creators dump an entire script into the generator and expect it to sound human. Real people don’t talk like that. The creators getting ultra-realistic AI voices generate line by line, sometimes sentence by sentence. Every generation slightly changes the energy and pacing. And when you stitch those together properly, something weird happens. Your brain stops hearing AI… and starts hearing a real person.

So I'm sure you guys have heard the term "AI slop", and everyone sorta defines it differently. Maybe you think it's those TikToks of AI-generated fruits going on dates. Maybe it's infographics with misspelled words. Maybe it's something else entirely. But I want to talk about it in the context of communication. Internal, external, content you put out into the world. I write my LinkedIn posts with AI. My agent knows my business, how I write, how I speak. That's just how I work now. And there's nothing wrong with that. I think everyone should be using AI to write if it makes them more efficient. But this isn't a binary yes or no. It's a spectrum. Sometimes AI can draft and send automatically. Most of the time, I want it to just draft. Then I review. If someone sends me an email with em dashes everywhere, I don't actually care at all that they used AI. The fact that I can clearly tell it's AI-generated isn't the problem. What I do start asking is: → Did they proofread this? → Is this completely accurate? And subconsciously, I might start losing trust. Not just in the email but in the person who sent it. Our job here has changed from writer to reviewer. This quote has really stuck with me: "You can outsource your thinking, but you can never outsource your understanding." When your name is attached to the content, you take credit if it lands, as you should. But that also means you need to take accountability if it's incorrect. Taste and reviewing are becoming more important than ever. AI is super intelligent and powerful, but I don't want to see a world where we trust AI so much, that we stop reviewing things, and then the human on the other end of the content starts losing trust in us. That's why even though I write with AI, and people know that, I still try my best to disguise it and make it sound as "Nate" as possible. Check out the LinkedIn post I just wrote about this HERE