A year ago, I was still convincing people that AI assistants could be trusted with real work. This week, I watched a security team approve Claude for company-wide use in under an hour. The reason? The new Compliance API integrations mean they can govern it the same way they govern everything else. That's the quiet shift happening right now. It's not about flashier models (though Opus 4.7 is genuinely impressive). It's about Claude becoming something that fits into how organizations already work — governance, audit trails, self-hosted sandboxes for agents, identity controls. The May 2026 updates aren't trying to wow anyone. They're trying to remove the last reasons not to use it ,And honestly? That's the more interesting story. What's been the unlock for your team?

I built an emaildesigner and I managed to make it into a command, that is new and exciting. I changed the colorings to get the design more layered and pop more. i still want to work on the sales scripts, but I will come back to that. I learnt to move on. When I have learnt more, which I do every step here, it is easier to get the output I want.

I’ve been working heavily around AI automation and operational systems lately, mainly focusing on ways businesses can reduce repetitive tasks, improve efficiency, and simplify workflows without making processes overly complicated. One thing I’ve learned pretty quickly ,The biggest improvements usually don’t come from the “craziest” AI setups. They come from fixing small bottlenecks that waste time every single day. Things like: - delayed follow-ups - scattered information - repetitive admin work - inconsistent communication - manual task handling Even small workflow automations can make a massive difference when they’re implemented correctly. I’m here to learn, connect, share ideas, and see what other people are building in the AI automation space. Curious, what’s one automation or workflow you’ve implemented that actually delivered real results?😗

I’ve been watching our 3,700 students in AIS+, and I noticed the people making the most money are all doing this: https://app.aiautomationsociety.ai/10-hours The people charging $5,000, $10,000, even $50,000 per engagement weren't better builders. Before they ever opened n8n/Claude Code, they did one thing differently: → They found the automations worth building first. It’s like a mini audit. Just by asking a few questions and mapping out the opportunities, they were able to get clients excited and also choose the right projects to work on. And the best part is you can practice by running this same system on YOURSELF. I call it 10 Hours to 10 Seconds, because doing this can easily save you or your clients 10 hours a week by automating the right things. Get all the details here: https://app.aiautomationsociety.ai/10-hours Talk soon, Nate PS: If you’re in AIS+, this has already been updated and provided to you at no cost. You can find it in the classroom

I spent 100 hours testing Claude Code vs ChatGPT Codex and what I found genuinely surprised me. Same prompts, same builds, both tools side by side, and one of them hit way harder than I expected. If you're picking between coding agents right now, then this video is the breakdown you actually need before you commit.