I realize this is a Memorial Day holiday weekend and this may be a fairly big ask. However, I would greatly appreciate your feedback no later than May 26th as I begin organizing final Summer Session product structures, vendor coordination, and seasonal consolidation planning. Unfortunately, vendors do not recognize Memorial Day holiday schedules. For the Summer Sessions we have preliminarily identified the following list of products and strength options. As part of refining and streamlining the final Summer Session product listings, I’d greatly appreciate your input regarding which products/strengths you would most likely have interest in over the course of the summer season. There is no need to respond to every product listed below. Simply reply with the products and/or strengths you would most likely have interest in. Also, if there are additional peptides or strengths you would like to see included, please feel free to indicate: • product name • preferred mg strength Product Name 5-Amino -1MQ 50mg AHK-CU Raw Topical 10grams Aicar 50mg Cagrilintide 5mg or 10mg Crystagen 20mg DSIP 10mg Epithalon 10mg - 40mg or 50mg GHK-CU Raw Topical 10grams GHK-CU 50mg or 100mg Glow (BPC 10mg/TB500 10mg.GHK-CU50mg) 70mg GLPTIRZ 10mg - 15mg or 20mg Glutathione 500mg or 1500mg HGH Frag 171-191 5mg HGH Somatropin 191 AA 15IU - 24IU or 36IU KPV 10mg L-Carnitine 10ml x 500mg/ml or 10ml x 600mg/ml NAD+ 100mg - 500mg or 1000mg NA Selank 30mg NA Semax 30mg Pinealon 5mg - 10mg or 20mg Selank 10mg Semax 10mg Thymulin 10mg

Human Growth Hormone gets talked about everywhere now — longevity, recovery, fat loss, anti-aging, body composition, performance. But HGH is one of the most misunderstood compounds in this entire space. Most people either: • Use too little and expect overnight transformation• Or push doses aggressively without understanding blood sugar, recovery demands, estrogen balance, sleep, or long-term management Then when the side effects show up — water retention, numb hands, fatigue, poor glucose control — they assume HGH “doesn’t work.” The reality is usually simpler: The strategy was wrong. One of the biggest mistakes people make is thinking HGH behaves like a standard anabolic where “more = more.” It doesn’t. 1–2 IU and 6–8 IU are essentially different tools with different physiological responses and different tradeoffs. Low-dose HGH tends to behave more like systemic recovery and restoration support: • Sleep quality • Recovery • Joint/tendon support • Skin quality • Mild body composition improvements • Long-term repair and resiliency Moderate dosing begins shifting more toward: • Nutrient partitioning • Recomposition • Faster recovery capacity • Increased fullness • More noticeable cosmetic effects Higher dosing moves into an entirely different category: • Aggressive physique manipulation • Increased recovery demands • Blood glucose management • Water balance issues • Insulin sensitivity concerns • Greater need for monitoring and support compounds Another major point that gets missed constantly: HGH does not operate in isolation. The GH → IGF-1 conversion process is heavily influenced by the surrounding hormonal environment — especially estrogen balance, insulin sensitivity, sleep quality, inflammation, training stimulus, and recovery. Crash estrogen too hard and HGH often becomes dramatically less effective. Ignore glucose management and eventually performance usually suffers. Ignore sleep and recovery and you undermine the very signaling pathways HGH relies on. The goal is not simply “more growth hormone.”

My perspective on the evolution of testing and why Janoshik became such a dominant focus within the peptide and research space. Again — this is simply my perspective. In the earlier stages of peptide community growth, awareness, access, and participation were significantly smaller than they are today. The overall market was far less developed, and very few analytical laboratories were willing to work directly with individual community members. At the time, most laboratories primarily supported: • pharmaceutical companies • universities • research institutions • commercial clients • or established business accounts Very few labs openly supported direct-to-consumer or individual-submitted peptide testing. Janoshik became one of the first widely recognized laboratories willing to support testing access for individuals within these communities. Because of that: • the reports became social proof • communities became familiar with the reporting format • and vendors eventually realized that “acceptable proof” had effectively standardized around a single recognizable laboratory name, which Over time, created a self-reinforcing cycle. The problem now is that the peptide and research space has exploded in the West. Awareness, participation, vendor growth, and overall product volume have increased dramatically over the past several years. With that growth, the demand for qualified professional testing facilities has also increased significantly. Today, there are now far more qualified laboratories capable of servicing individuals within these communities — many utilizing equivalent instrumentation, equivalent analytical methodologies, and comparable technical capabilities. At the same time, testing demand itself has increased substantially. As a result: • pricing increases are becoming material and ongoing • operational resource demands continue rising • equipment costs and maintenance requirements remain substantial • and testing volume pressures continue expanding across the industry

Alright… summer’s here. Which means: Vacations, Time Off, Traveling, Weekend getaways. 😂 I’d like to open the floor to you all for your feedback and suggestions for this next round. Your input and product suggestions will help drive the selection process as I work to source the best quality products at the lowest possible pricing. Timely feedback is greatly appreciated, especially with the upcoming holiday weekend, as it helps allow adequate time for sourcing and evaluation. Target date to kick off the Beach Britches Session is June 7th. July Delivery Your body. Your code.

When I think summertime for me — it does not really change my thought process on what peptides I want to research. However, with the longer days, I’m usually more active. So for me, I usually feel like I have more energy simply from the fact it stays lighter out longer. So if I’m already in a cycle that carries me through most of the summer, I’m pretty much locked into that protocol. I’m not one to randomly start adding or subtracting compounds mid-cycle. I stay locked in until that cycle ends. Now if my cycle is ending around late June or early July, that’s usually when my thought process starts shifting more toward bioregulators, which I personally like to run about 3–4 times per year. I’ve found my washout cycles are usually the best time for me personally to leverage bioregulators and help bring systems back toward homeostasis. Curious how everyone else approaches seasonal changes in their research cycles.