Your thoughts on the "No Self-Promotion" rule?
This little community is new and I'd like it to grow into something that members want, which is why I'm asking for your input. I have the No Self-Promotion rule because I've too often seen Facebook groups where Author A will pop up out of nowhere, make a post essentially saying "Buy My Book!" and linking to Amazon. This behaviour is spammy, cringeworthy, and not good for members (or Author A, for that matter). This is the clear case that is most definitely ruled out in this community. Eventually, I would like readers and authors to connect in this Club in various ways. Not only through the conversations, but also through events — perhaps live Q&A sessions, author readings, book launch events, book clubs... who knows? It all depends on what members want. We'll get there when we get there. In the mean time, I'd love your thoughts on authors *mentioning* their own books in their comments, when it's relevant in the context. For example, suppose Author B is responding to a post asking for historical romance recommendations and they say something like: "I really enjoyed Julia Quinn's Bridgerton series and recommend those. You might also like my novel, The London Lord, which is an historical romance also set in Regency era England." I can see how that would be annoying in the wrong context, or if Author B *repeatedly* mentions their own books, or doesn't contribute anything else. But occasionally, from an active, contributing member? In an appropriate context? What do you think? I'd love to hear from members who are authors and who aren't! Feel free to PM me if you prefer. Thanks so much for your contributions to the Historical Fiction Club as we grow. You're helping make this a fun, interesting place to hang out and talk about historical fiction 💖