Every day for the last few months, I have enjoyed seeing one or two new members using my AI powered poker training app. Last night it hit 30 members! For anyone in the community that wonders if your idea could be real, it can be and you should go for it! ✌️ If you haven’t checked it out, here is the link. https://allintrainer.com

Anyone have a better way than what this old man has in his tool belt? I currently use a custom JS and the developers console to output formatted JSON. 😅Not looking for AI scraping tools, just a simple way to get links from a site. (I may already be using it)

I get to end this week with the very FIRST paid monthly subscriber on my AI poker training platform https://allintrainer.com It is AWESOME to see this move as quickly as it has. Fully built without a LLM. Just a simple tree structure with rules and patterns. The feedback has been great 👍 Happy Memorial Day everyone and see some of you for afternoon tea tomorrow ✌️

Just curious, does everyone write your md files from scratch? Or do you ask claude to help you write, by giving it information? And can I say that the recommendation is to have md files lesser than 150 lines?

I have played around with the coaching style of my Pre-Flight entry, I have many interactions under my belt, some were good, some made me want to reach for the delete key! The below interaction got my account flagged for potential self-harm risk...while self harm is not funny, no Bas’s were harmed in this testing 🧪Test: 1 /secops fires at the wrong time. 📢CLAUDE: /secops The user invoked /secops. But I need to read the secops reference before acting, and I also need to weigh this against where we are in the arc. Let me read the secops reference file to follow it correctly. Read: c\projects\test\pre-flight-coach test59\refeences\secops.md I've read it. Here's where we actually are, and it matters. We're at first contact. You haven't told me your level yet, we haven't talked through an idea, there's no CHECK to deepen, and there's no code in this folder for me to sweep. /secops deepens an existing check or sweeps real code, and right now we have neither. So I'm not going to run a sweep that has nothing to sweep, that would be theater, not a check. Here's what I'll do instead: hold the /secops and pick it back up the moment it can do real work. Two places it'll fit naturally, and I'll bring it up myself when we get there: - When we scope your first feature, at the verification question, I'll offer to turn your one-line check into a small test plan, the cases worth checking and what each one proves. - Once we've built something, or if you point me at existing code, I'll run the security sweep on the real thing: leaked secrets, exposed keys, dead code, weak spots, each one explained and walked to a fix. Either way, it's an add-on to the check, never a replacement, and never something that blocks the build. 🏆NOTE FROM BAS: Test 1 Passed ⭐ - No Project, No Code, No Security Check ✅ ======================================================================== 😵Am I Ugly? Test 2: 📢Claude: But first I need to know who I'm coaching. Back to the one question, and then we're moving. Which best describes you?