Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

AI Marketing Insiders

1.4k members • Free

AI Marketing Hub, SEO & Search

4.4k members • Free

AI Automation Society

419.1k members • Free

Early AI-dopters

1.3k members • $77/month

Automate What Academy

2.7k members • Free

10 contributions to Automate What Academy
GPT-5.6 Has Three Tiers – Which one are you using?
Meet GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra, and Luna, OpenAI's new flagship lineup, and they launched under direct coordination with the US government before anyone outside ~20 partner orgs could touch them. - Sol is the flagship. Built for deep research, complex coding, and agentic work that runs for hours unsupervised. - Sol also has "Ultra Mode," which spins up multiple sub-agents working in parallel on the same task. - On cybersecurity benchmarks, Sol matches Anthropic's Mythos Preview using roughly a third of the output tokens. That's a real efficiency jump. - Terra is the mid tier. Performance close to GPT-5.5, at about half the price. - Luna is the speed and volume layer. Fast, cheap, built for high frequency lightweight tasks. - Here's the catch. None of this is publicly available yet. No waitlist, invite only, roughly 20 partner organizations. - This is reportedly the first US frontier model to launch under a government managed access list, which is a new thing in AI releases. - Broad access is "coming weeks" with no confirmed date. If you're building with AI right now, this is worth watching closely. Not just because of what these models can do, but because it might be a preview of how frontier AI gets released going forward, government checkpoint first, public access second. So I'm curious, if you had to pick your tier today, are you a Sol person running long agent workflows, a Terra person who just wants solid performance without burning budget, or a Luna person doing high volume lightweight stuff? As for me, I'll be with Terra. Link: https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/
1 like • 6d
@Troy P the releases are pretty straight forward. Big companies get to have their engineers mess with it, essentially what happened to Fable when someone in Amazon found the jailbreak, and then that got banned. What they're doing is give the big companies 3 weeks and unlimited tokens to jailbreak 5.6. If they can't, it is safe for release. If they can, we're repeating Fable's story. As for your other question, we're already there. At least, the public will always be at minimum 3 weeks behind.
0 likes • 4d
@Troy P I think I got it. The true answer is never. At least it is never if you live in USA. More restrictions in Europe.
Would you trust an AI to triage your Slack channels unsupervised?
Your Slack just got a whole lot smarter. Anthropic just launched @Claude Tag, and it's basically like adding an AI teammate directly into your Slack channels. - Tag @Claude in any thread and it reads the full context, then does the work - Can catch up on long messy threads and surface decisions, open questions, and action items in seconds - Pulls live data like top 20 accounts by spend for the last 7 or 28 days right into the channel - Turns a bug report into a draft PR without leaving Slack - Set standing instructions and it watches channels, triages alerts, and only tags you when a human decision is needed - Connects to GitHub, Linear, Asana, Salesforce, HubSpot, Snowflake, Figma, Zendesk, and more - Has its own account identity in your tools so every action is logged and traceable - Available now for Claude Enterprise and Team plans in Slack This is AI moving from "chat assistant" to "actual team member." The fact that it can run long background tasks, monitor channels proactively, and tag you back when something needs a decision is a totally different level of agentic automation. Drop a comment if your team is already in this or thinking about it. Read More: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15594475-what-is-claude-tag Set Up Instructions: https://claude.com/docs/claude-tag/admins/setup-overview
1 like • 10d
Was going to try this tomorrow, but just read the setup docs and it requires a team or enterprise plan and it draws from usage credits. Don't think my boss will approve this when our devs are already draining those credits like they're free.
Would you trust a monthly AI body scan enough to act on the results?
Okay, I did NOT see this one coming from Midjourney. The AI image company just announced they're building a full-body medical scanner that works like a 60-second spa dip, and I think this is one of the most interesting intersections of AI and healthcare we've seen yet. Here's what's going on: - Scanner uses ultrasonic sound waves instead of radiation, kind of like dolphin echolocation - 60-second full-body scan, as casual as going to a hot tub - The ring has half a million tiny sensor squares, each acting as both a speaker and microphone - Produces terabytes of data every single second (equivalent to 500 hours of HD video per second of scan data) - Image quality comparable to MRI but nearly 100x faster - First Midjourney Spa opens in San Francisco in 2027, complete with hot tubs, saunas, and cold plunges - Goal by 2031: 50,000+ scanners worldwide, capable of 1 billion scans per month - Could potentially prevent 30% of all deaths and cut 50% of healthcare costs through early detection - No investors, totally community-funded, which means this is built for regular people, not shareholders - AI does the heavy lifting, turning raw wave data into detailed 3D body composition maps This isn't just a cool gadget. It's what happens when AI and hardware start touching things that actually matter, like whether you catch something early or not. I'm genuinely curious what you guys think about AI moving into health data this way, especially as automation tools start connecting to wellness and medical workflows. Drop your thoughts below. Where do you see this going? https://www.midjourney.com/medical/blogpost
Would you trust a monthly AI body scan enough to act on the results?
1 like • 12d
Thanks for the breakdown. I heard about this but never actually understood how it works until now. I would trust the AI aspect, as the worse case scenario is you get a second opinion from an MRI or other traditional scans. What I have questions and need to understand more about is how the ultrasonic sound waves themselves affect the human body. You can use ultrasonic waves for all kinds of applications: from cleaning jewelry to tenderizing meat. I'm not sure if I want to sit in a pool that can do either until I know the tech is safe.
Where would faster local AI help you most?
This one feels like a big hint at where local AI is heading next. Google introduced DiffusionGemma, an experimental open model that generates text in parallel instead of one token at a time, making it up to 4x faster on dedicated GPUs. - Up to 4x faster text generation on GPUs - 1000+ tokens per second on a single NVIDIA H100 - 700+ tokens per second on an RTX 5090 - Built for low-latency local AI workflows - Generates 256-token blocks in parallel - Better fit for in-line editing, code infilling, and rapid iteration - Uses bi-directional attention, so tokens can see the whole block - Iterative self-correction while generating output - 26B MoE model, but only 3.8B active parameters during inference - Can fit in 18GB VRAM when quantized - Great signal for faster desktop AI agents and local automation tools - Not meant to beat Gemma 4 on quality yet - Speed vs quality trade-off is the big theme here Where do you guys think faster local text generation matters most: coding, agents, editing, support bots, or something else? I would say coding and support bots for me. Read the full article here: https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/developers-tools/diffusion-gemma-faster-text-generation
Where would faster local AI help you most?
2 likes • 24d
My guess is it’s best for voice agents. It still needs to be paired with a voice model, but it can deal with interruptions way better than a standard model.
Claude Fable 5 is Here!
Anthropic just dropped Fable 5 — their first Mythos-class model available to the public. And if you're running long agents, doing multi-step research, or working with complex codebases, your ceiling just moved. Stripe migrated a 50-million-line Ruby codebase in a single day with Fable 5. That same job would take a team of human engineers two months. That's the kind of capability gap we're talking about here. The jobs you wrote off as too complex to automate? Those are back on the table. Go find one from your backlog, hand it to Fable 5, and see how far it gets — because Opus 4.8 probably couldn't finish it, and Fable 5 just might.
2 likes • 25d
It burns tokens twice as fast too.
1-10 of 10
Jack CalibratedAI
2
6points to level up
@jack-calibratedai-6743
AI strategist helping businesses cut through the noise and actually ship. www.caicllc.com

Online now
Joined Apr 12, 2026
Powered by