Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by J

Juris Vitae = “Law of Life”: stewards learning their inherent rights, due process, faith, liberty, and self-governance to stand in truth in community.

38 contributions to Juris vitae
Announcement
This thread is for all new announcement.
1 like • 10d
Today’s class is added to the classroom tab under the “History and Law” room. We went over the appellate process according to Pennsylvania rules & procedures. Biggest tip of the day was on, snapshots of your docket entries. Watch video now in classroom or click the link below for the shortcut. https://www.skool.com/juris-vitae-4890/classroom/5bc86150?md=38cb654ce75b4c63b868cc424cac5e44
2 likes • 3d
@Joseph Decker here is where you can find the class
Posts
Some good post and materials to look at
1 like • 24d
https://www.facebook.com/share/1L8dK6s5oj/?mibextid=wwXIfr
1 like • 5d
Freedom of religion- 1st amendment https://www.instagram.com/reel/DfXzgpBp1Cn/?xtok=aHloaWQyeXNpYzd1
C.S. Videos
All Child support related videos
3 likes • 21d
Must watch/listen to understand the history of Title IV-D & its original Intent https://youtu.be/dqHvLYh4MEs?si=il_Y55VOJaakAAA2
2 likes • 15d
Notice how she gave judicial notice and then reminded judge so that he can look at that order. Same with an objection, make sure you don’t let the hearing continue until there’s a ruling/notice by the judge. Preserve the record for appeals. https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1BxB24ppoc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
Understanding the Mootness Doctrine
Its Origins, Constitutional Authority, Exceptions, and Relationship to the Right of Appeal Subject: Constitutional Law, Judicial Doctrines, and Appellate Procedure Jurisdiction: Federal Law and Pennsylvania Law Lesson Objective: Understand when the mootness doctrine originated, how courts apply it, what exceptions exist, and how to examine its application when constitutional rights are involved. --- # 1. Introduction: Can a Court Refuse to Decide an Appeal? Imagine that a government agency issues an order restricting an individual's rights for 60 days. The individual challenges the order and appeals. However, before the appellate court reviews the matter, the 60-day restriction expires. The government argues that the appeal should be dismissed because the order is no longer in effect. The court agrees, finding that the controversy is now *moot*. But consider the questions this raises: - Does the expiration of an order eliminate the legal controversy? - What if the same restriction could be imposed again? - What if the original order continues to produce legal consequences? - Does dismissing an appeal prevent meaningful review of government action? - Can a judicially developed doctrine limit a right expressly protected by a constitution? These questions are central to understanding the **mootness doctrine**. Mootness is an established principle of American jurisprudence, but its proper application must be understood alongside constitutional guarantees, judicial authority, and the availability of meaningful legal remedies. # 2. What Is the Mootness Doctrine? The mootness doctrine is a principle of *justiciability* that addresses whether a legal dispute remains appropriate for judicial resolution. *Justiciability refers to the legal conditions determining whether a court may properly decide a dispute. A controversy may become moot when subsequent events eliminate the parties' continuing legal dispute and prevent a court from granting any effective relief.
2 likes • 20d
Dont forget to download you pdf copy for easier reading!
HOW TO OBTAIN THE RECORDS BEHIND TITLE IV-D IN ANY STATE
Federal FOIA, State Public-Records Laws, Cooperative Agreements and Court Records Most people who interact with child-support enforcement see only the local office, hearing officer, prosecutor, court employee, agency representative, or judge standing in front of them. But Title IV-D does not begin at the county courthouse. To understand how the system actually operates, you must trace the structure backward: Federal Law ↓ Federal Regulations ↓ State Title IV-D Plan ↓ State IV-D Agency ↓ Cooperative Agreements ↓ Courts / Counties / Prosecutors / Local Agencies ↓ Local Program Administration Once you understand that chain, you can determine: • Who possesses the records? • What agreement controls the relationship? • What duties were assigned? • How is the activity funded? • What records must be maintained? • Which public-records law applies to each custodian? That is the purpose of this lesson. I. START WITH THE SOURCE: TITLE IV-D IS A FEDERAL PROGRAM Title IV-D is part of the federal Social Security Act. One of the principal statutes governing State participation is: 42 U.S.C. § 654 - State plan for child and spousal support. A participating State must maintain a State Plan satisfying federal requirements. Among other things, § 654 requires the plan to: • operate throughout the political subdivisions of the State; • provide for State financial participation; • establish or designate a single and separate organizational unit within the State to administer the plan; • provide child-support establishment and enforcement services; and • provide for cooperative arrangements required by federal law. The basic structure therefore begins: Congress ↓ Federal Title IV-D Requirements ↓ State Participation Through an Approved State Plan The State does not merely label its child-support program "Title IV-D." There is an actual federal statutory and regulatory framework behind it. II. THE STATE PLAN CREATES A FEDERAL-STATE RECORDS TRAIL The next major document is the State Title IV-D Plan.
3
0
HOW TO OBTAIN THE RECORDS BEHIND TITLE IV-D IN ANY STATE
1-10 of 38
J Nice
5
298 points to level up
@j-nice-3771
Ya

Active 9h ago
Joined Jun 14, 2026