@Anna Stoilova You’re making some really important points here — and I fully agree that consistency matters a lot. At the same time, I’m wondering if there’s more going on underneath the surface. Over the last years, impressions have dropped across the platform, even for people who did stay consistent. The algorithm seems to put much more weight on relevance, niche, clarity and meaningful engagement now, not just posting frequency. So it looks like your reach can fall even when you’re “doing everything right”. On top of that, LinkedIn itself has changed quite a bit between 2024–2026: - less mass reach → more targeted reach - more creators → more competition - a stronger focus on meaningful interactions instead of just likes From that perspective, it almost feels “normal” that numbers go down over time, even without becoming inconsistent. About the three solutions you mention (manual, scheduling, AI): they definitely help with rhythm — but I keep asking myself: - Do they really solve the core issue? - Can any tool fix a lack of direction? With AI especially, there’s also a new risk: content that feels too generic, predictable or automated seems to get penalized more and more. AI can be a great support, but I’m not sure it can replace a clear, human point of view. For me, the deeper question behind all of this is: Is it really about posting more — or about posting clearer? Because when I look at what LinkedIn currently rewards, it seems to be: - a clear niche - consistent expertise - relevant, grounded stories - real insights from experience rather than simply more volume. And in the end, those first 60–90 minutes after posting still decide a lot: - strong, relevant engagement → reach - no real engagement → the post disappears quickly. Curious how you see this: - Is the main lever for most people really consistency, - or is it first getting clear on who they speak to and what they want to be known for?

@Anna Stoilova Thanks! Very interesting to know! For me as summary: a shift from network-based reach to interest-based distribution: - who you engage with - what topics you consistently write about - how clearly the algorithm can categorize your content the algorithm still asks one question in the first 60–90 minutes: “Is this content worth people’s time?” Clarity first. Consistency second. Systems third. Without clarity, no system saves you. With clarity, almost any system works.

@Anna Stoilova Thanks Anna — really appreciate your questions. To clarify: I’m focused on hands‑on professionals. People often invisible when it comes to positioning, communication, and turning their expertise into real opportunities. This can be a CEO or MD, however also an internal sales or the cleaning lady So yes — this includes offline professions. These are the people I’ve developed for years: from working on the floor to becoming confident, capable leaders. I agree about the ‘money’ category being crowded. That’s not the lane I want to stay in. My direction is skill → positioning → leadership → growth. Should I stay in that category or go to self improvement ? What do you think ? Where I am now: I’m opening the community and my next priority is simple — speak with the first 10 people, understand where they are stuck, and build the first mini‑transformation around what they actually need. I’m prepared to pivot fast. No fixed ideas — maybe to many ideas However, of course if you can prepare a course in front, it makes that when they enter already have something 😅 Ones the communitie is bigger, you automaticlly have this ..

@Anna Stoilova Thanks Anna — your questions are super helpful. The people I help are skilled, hands‑on professionals who are great at the work itself, but unclear about direction, communication, and how to grow into the role that actually fits them. That’s the core transformation. And yes — that can absolutely lead to more income, but that’s a consequence, not the promise. It’s a positioning and growth transformation, not a ‘make X dollars’ offer. For years I’ve been taking people from operational roles to confident, capable professionals with real responsibility — through clarity, direction, and consistent development. That’s why I’m leaning toward the self‑improvement category. It simply fits the work better: communication, leadership, clarity, capability. However Skooladmins prefers me to be in Money Your point about AI and which sectors feel the most pressure to upskill is a strong one — there’s a real opportunity there. Thanks again — your questions help me refine where this brand needs to go.”

@Anna Stoilova Indeed, connecting to some others and also learn from each other .. That is also the cool thing about Skool, all the communities that can help you grow 👊

@Anna Stoilova Thanks!

@Anna Stoilova Correct, that is still a bit a problem .. Skilled & Paid or Skilled professionals is a bit broad .. on youtube I changed it to 'work & life performance' as the structure around it. So looking forward to day 3 and learn how to adapt 😅

@Kathy Fluch Proof that when you pick a lane and commit, momentum follows. Well done. Excited to see what consistent execution over the next 30 days will create for you!