@Mike Gagnon The stuff that is being removed right now is too graphic to be discussed in public forums, so do you think it is still appropriate to be shown to k-12 students? You will be banned from Youtube, arrested for speaking passages out loud in public, but okay for our kids?

@Mike Gagnon When I was in school, they removed the anatomy section of our English to French dictionary, because it had cartoon images of both male and female characters, and you could see the shape of a cartoon breast. 🤡 Today, the content can get you arrested when speaking it to an adult in public. Sorry but not appropriate for k-12 education purposes. Sure there are sex scenes in numerous pieces of lit, read Stephen King's IT, there is some questionable content without a doubt, but that isn't the purpose of the book, whereas these are meant to be obtuse and offensive. This isn't literature, but pure garbage trying to be pushed as revolutionary when it is all ideological indoctrination. Do you know the material you are defending? There is no excuse for this material to be in schools, as it has no intrinsic value beyond spreading hate and division. If you want this stuff, you can still buy it, they aren't being Censored. Remember words have meanings, Censored means you can't get it anywhere, you could be arrested for owning it, or executed in some countries. So many people misuse words when they are passionate about things, like those screaming about nazis, fascists and communists, not realizing they are part of the same political sphere. There is no horseshoe theory from Freedom to Authoritarianism.

I wish this example rang true for everyone, but alas it is not reality.

@Baz Morris Join up and hang out, be part of the founding members.