Here's the link to today's ISP https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82551105513?pwd=R6M3TW3kRPlekEk86ae4qVerZ0VjYP.1

There is probably a sentence you have repeated about yourself so many times that you no longer hear it as a sentence. You hear it as truth. “I always quit.” “I’m terrible with money.” “I’m not confident.” “I overthink everything.” “I’m just not that kind of person.” “That’s who I am.” Those are the kinds of statements we examine here. For this thread, post one identity statement you catch yourself repeating. Then underneath it, rewrite it as a direction instead of a verdict. Example: Old code: “I always avoid conflict.” New code: “I am becoming someone who handles difficult conversations directly and respectfully.” Your turn. What code are you running—and what are you replacing it with?

Bo’s idea of rewriting a verdict as a direction makes sense to me as a learner. ‘I’m learning to explain this clearly’ gives me somewhere to go. It also leaves room to ask a question instead of pretending I already understand. I’m working on sales and practical AI, and I’d like my language to encourage the next useful attempt. How do you write a direction that stays specific enough to act on? What would you add to a phrase like ‘I’m becoming a clearer communicator’ so it points toward something observable?

Hi Bo and everyone, I'm Glen. Your three-part introduction gives me a useful starting point. Today I'm someone learning sales and practical AI, with years of contracting behind me. I'm working toward becoming a clearer communicator who listens carefully and follows through. One piece of evidence I'd like to create is a practice explanation that another person can repeat back accurately. When you choose evidence for an identity like that, how small do you make the first step? I'd appreciate a concrete example.