Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

The CTMU Club

56 members • Free

19 contributions to The CTMU Club
Question for Chris and CTMU Enthusiasts:
What if information possesses an "energy-mass" quality? Could what we perceive as "dark matter" actually be a form of information? This perspective invites us to explore the relationship between knowledge and the fabric of the universe. How might this reshape our understanding of dark matter within the CTMU framework? ?
1 like • Jan 6
@Turtle Miles In the CTMU -it is true that in loving others: you are loving both the G.O.D.; and yourself. Just as true -when you love the G.O.D. you are loving yourself; and thriugh loving you: the G.O.D. is loving itself. "Each one of us is a unique expression in the vast cognitive matrix of reality." (See video below) When doing harm to another sentient being we are doing harm to that vast cognitive matrix and ourselves. When any individual thinks: their thoughts are not an isolated event, nor an isolated proccess. Our thoughts are a critical part of the universes function. In the CTMU councisness did not randomly spawn in the minds of humans or animals. CTMU claims that councisness predates lifeforms as we know it. It claims that councisness was perscribed and distrubuted to each of us. The perscription of councisness is more or less what makes us "syntactors" in the CTMU. If you ask me the CTMU is very complex, but it's very correct. I'm quite a skeptic, but I find the more I study the CTMU, the more correct it gets. It's useful to me because it helps me learn other complex topics more easily. It's somewhat of a useful mental exerscise if not anything else. https://youtu.be/d_LiGabLkzE?si=fkP7V7fE4z_OdW5b
Traveling with thy feet. Current progress & goals
45lbs rucksack - 14.5 miles - 11:38 minute per mole pace. 2 years ago I could do 7.5 miles with the same weight at 8:30 minutes per mile twice a day. My heart rate is back to normal 2 months after anesthesia and the distal radius orientation surgery on my wrist. My goal by next year is to perform a 2-3 day solo mountian trail excursion with 35-45lbs of gear traveling 10-20 miles per day and digging 1-2 hides sites a quarter to a half mile off trail. I will mark these hide sites on a 1:25000 topographic map by locating myself with lensatic compass and 2 landmarks. ---------- On the secound excursion I will will challange myself to navigate from the trail to each hide site via compass and map.
1
0
Traveling with thy feet. Current progress & goals
A question about causation
Let's see if I have this down. When Chris points out in his Knowles interview that it can't be as simple as the past causing the future and that "the past and the future must cause EACH OTHER in a loop", is he saying that since the past refers to the future and since you can't refer to something that isn't real, the future's existence is not caused by the past since it has to be assumed to "already" exist? And also that since determinism doesn't work, and you must have freedom in the universe, the future must cause that which causes itself, and this is "meta-causation"?
1 like • Dec '24
I would look into "retro-causation" in addition to every other type of causation you can read up on and disseminate. That's gonna help. We know that a present event can determine the "meta-data"(if you will) of past event. In other words, a present event does effect peoples memory and perception of a past event. If time can be traveled through by anything -it'd make sense for information, or particles to be sent backwards through it so that the universe could better self actualize. If time is a loop, then I personally beleive that time istelf as a whole could be functioning as a tool for advanced self actualization. This tools format would be a gargantuan network of cognitvely generated time loops(generated by the G.O.D.) each producing a hyper active array of branching event timelines. From this, the global operator descriptor can pluck one chain of events, and link it to another -until it reaches an optimal model of reality for its terminal domain(our universe, multiverse, or omniverse[whichever of these imperical induction science reveals true])
1 like • Dec '24
https://youtu.be/gMGR3J90mXY?si=jrbrLu2t2x9HHb_k
Question's about the dualistic nature of the two semi-models.
Does the non-terminal domain generate the terminal domian? Does the non-terminal domain do this through descriptive endomorphism? ----------------- Bound telesis is simply raw unbound telesis from the non-terminal domain: that has been configured into matter or energy; as it enters the ternimal domain. Correct? Descriptive endomorphism generates particles into space from unbound telesis. Correct? Linear ectomorphism then generates objects such as: atoms, molecules, stars and more -with those particles. Correct? Should the main body of unbound telesis not shrink as more of it becomes bound telesis and generates into particles?
0 likes • Dec '24
@Omni Azyzz Actually I wasn't clear enough. Thanks for the directions! Now I know where to look in the books. ------------------------ I meant to say that: bound telesis *was* UBT - it becomes bound telesis once it is configured and enters the ternimal domain as a telon. And by: the shrinking of UBT -I ment the quantity of UBT and in tern: the size of the nonterminal domain as a whole. As UBT is configured and generated into the terminal domain, it must result in "less UBT in the non-terminal domain." That's what I ment. Obviously I am assuming that UBT -or God- is finite or limited in some aspect to begin with here. I appriciate the chance to verify my understandings of the CTMU with all of you here. Know that you all guide my studies, and have a positve effect on my life.
Is Telesis finite?
Tommy says "it depends." An excellent answer. Here's what it led me to. Let's say that telesis is infinite in quantity. An unlimited resource. If it is the case that telsis is infinite in quantity -then it must be limited in its availability; by virtue of it's dependence on God's ability to harvest it, and the Devils ability to harness or parasitize it. We must assume that in a sea of unlimited amounts of raw unbound telesis -God's ability to harvest it: is limited, or at risk of becoming inferior to the Devils ability to parasitize it; once it becomes bound telesis within the terminal domain -were the Devil is also bound. If telesis was not limited in this manner or another; then the conflict between God and the Devil would be non-existent. God will not destroy the Devil, becuase the devil is a critical component of the terminal domain that has gone awry - thus the Devil must be reconciled and saved, if the terminal domain is to be saved. So in the hypothetical instance that unbound telesis is infinite in quantity: the conflict between God and the Devil then imparts that God's ability to harvest, utilize, and secure sufficent amounts of unbound telesis to achive his will within the terminal domain; is in question. If God is all knowing, this would not be in question -it would be known fact. And so I think that God is very aware -that: there are more ways to fuck this up; than there are ways to get it right. Yes -God is all knowing, and all powerful- but he is not all controlling. This terminal domain we all reside in is an unprecedented attempt of self actualization. I apriciate this very much. It is my beleif, and I beleive I have attained it through the process of logical induction; applied to the CTMU. This feels quite fitting considering that the CTMU was itself created through logical induction.
2 likes • Dec '24
https://youtu.be/gMb4kAdMu_Y?si=JcZLtd_ixSA3h93R Is Telesis finite? - It depends. Tommy elaborates @50:25
1-10 of 19
Ginger Wildcat
3
36points to level up
@ginger-wildcat-3762
Just love studying the universe.

Active 209d ago
Joined Nov 29, 2024
INTJ
New Hampshire
Powered by