When diplomacy becomes legitimization
Europe keeps presenting itself as a defender of democracy, human rights, and international law. Yet when it comes to Iran’s regime, European leaders still seem tempted to offer relief, dialogue, and political exits, even after decades of terror, repression, hostage-taking, proxy warfare, and violence against the Iranian people. If sanctions are eased for a regime whose power structure includes the IRGC, that does not only affect diplomats in nice rooms. It strengthens the machinery of repression. It gives the regime time, money, legitimacy, and room to breathe. The same problem appears with symbolic gestures. When the Vatican honored an official representative of the Islamic Republic, the gesture was explained as diplomatic routine. But regimes use symbols. They turn handshakes, medals, meetings, and polite ceremonies into propaganda. So the question is: are Europe and the Catholic Church still reliable allies against tyranny if they keep granting legitimacy to regimes that stand against everything they claim to defend? This is not about hating Iran. Quite the opposite. Iran is an ancient culture, and the Iranian people are among the first victims of this regime. The question is whether the West is willing to stand with them, or whether it keeps mistaking regime diplomacy for peace. Because peace built on regime survival is not peace for the people living under that regime. It is only peace for those who do not have to live with the consequences.