Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
What is this?
Less
More
Memberships
Builder’s Console Log 🛠️
1.8k members • Free
2 contributions to Builder’s Console Log 🛠️
18d •
Perplexity free for 12 months via PayPal!
Perplexity free for 12 months via PayPal! https://www.perplexity.ai/join/p/paypal-subscription This is not an affiliate link I do not get any monitory rewards, or at least I don’t believe I do. Feel free to search on line to get the link from other sources. I have just signed up to it and and the offer seems legit. The offer end 31st December 2025 so you you in have one day left to sign up. Combining perplexity pro with perplexity’s ai browser gives the user access to other LLM GPT 5.2, Sonnet 4.5, Gemini three pro, Grok 4. “Pro Search usage: Pro users get “hundreds of Pro Searches per day” and the plan is described as “practically unlimited Pro Searches”, i.e., you are unlikely to hit a fixed daily cap under normal use. - Advanced model constraints: For GPT‑5.2, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 3 Pro, Grok 4 etc., Pro has generous access but heavy weeks can trigger temporary throttling (per-model rate limits to keep the service stable)” Source perplexity
0 likes • 8d
12 month offer still on for Students as well
15d •
Broken "insurance" GitHub Branch Checkpoint
I now don't agree with Corbins "insurance" with Github. I have spent over a month vide coding and this is the 4th time I try and checkout a prier branch to activate a last checkpoint. doing that still does not show the last point in my program both on dev and production. error is still there. I am exhausted! and tired of this always happening. I do not believe in GitHub if it wont do what Corbin claims!! i tell LLM to go back to prior branch and make sure all files are at that prior state. then run dev and localhost 2001. still shows the 2 weeks of work broken code on my landing page. Where the LLM now is trying to recreate what Google Studio originally created in a BAD way! Very fustrating! How am I suppose to properly bring back an old branch as obviously I must be doing it wrong
1 like • 8d
@Andres Dominicci I tried all three. But most of the time I let Cursor commit it for me because I can then ask it to search for a specific moment between all the branches to go back to. I have been making branches for each new feature. Wonder if the reason why it did not go back to a prior code properly was because I was also pushing out a production image to the registered domain. I spent almost a whole week going back to it and only noticed resolution when I upgraded the cursor subscription to a greater amount. Maybe the LLM was pushing out bad code since my suslbscription at the time reached it's limits and I was using Grok as it was free to use it during the holidays. Either way, I was expecting to be pushed back in time with no issues. The issue is gone now. After the cursor subscription, and 1.5 days, Gpt 5.2 iterated through the code and fixed multiple elint, typescript errors, degraded library versions. Grok created a default page that always came up when any error was found. Even if it was a minor error. That threw me off because I never asked for that and I dont remember seeing the LLM thoughts discussing doing that either. I appreciate your help! Thank you.
0 likes • 8d
@Ricky Rios I will start doing this now with major checkpoints. Thanks.
1-2 of 2
