This is copied over from the Facebook community. Here is some thoughts on a post that was made there... The other day this was posted: Hey ya’ll! Rat has been using r3ta for 4-5 months and lost a significant amount of weight. Rat’s food suppression has faded and has 10-15 more lbs to go. What have you stacked with R3ta to help cut the last few lbs and anything to add for food suppression? I keep reading T3sa and Motzsee. I commented that I disagreed with basically every comment (which by the way was to either add Tz or Cag). No shade to the original poster BTW. Here was my response when someone asked why I wouldn't add in other compounds: if someone has the last 10-15lbs left to lose, then Tess is going to cause temporary gain for one. If someone is in a stall and are tied to what the scale says, they're not going to like Tess. M0TS can be fine. It's also expensive and doesn't work for everyone. Half the comments are recommending things that cause more suppression (silly). Here's the more important piece of this: They've been on for 4-5 months and lost a significant amount. Now they said suppression has faded and have 10-15lbs more to lose. Question 1: How much are they using? Could they not just bump that up before stacking and adding all of these compounds? 4-5 months in following a normal titration schedule (which I hate BTW) won't put you at the max, so this person likely has room to go up. Question 2: At any point during this significant amount of loss did they recalculate calories? Are they even in a caloric deficit anymore? Question 3: Are they even in a stall? Everyone said all of these compounds to take. The person literally only said they had less suppression. That's it. They didn't say they were stuck, gaining, etc. There's SO much more but that in itself is enough to support the point that I'm trying to get across here. I've posted the stall-breaking cheat sheet in here before. There are a million things people can do before adding another compound. Why do we not do those?