Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Dominik

Agentic Architect AI Lab

21 members • Free

Senior devs ship their own products with AI leverage. 24h is the deadline! Real builds, tools and the business playbook. Hype-proof 🎯

Memberships

Upgraded | Blockchain&crypto

19 members • Free

Skoolers

168.5k members • Free

AI Monetizers

399 members • $39/month

32 contributions to Agentic Architect AI Lab
Very practical /fork example, available for everyone
Claude Code's /fork command again, cut spontaneusly during my work. Straight to the point, 110 Sec explanation.
1
0
New lesson is here!
How to spin 5 AI agents locally on the same codebase - with Git Worktrees. Easy and practical explanation that 5x every vibe coder and developer. In Advanced Concepts classroom https://www.skool.com/ai-for-software-business-9941/classroom/c99d7028?md=404b48140f604272acbe9b92c43eb858
2
0
New lessons on agent-skills
New lessons on agent-skills for software development. Lessons on Claude Code and OpenCode usage and lesson on specification step are added. This time, all will be made using OpenCode with GLM-5.1 model. I was using it extensively last week - now I can confirm that it is mature enough for this use case. Only code review step will be made with Opus, just to keep an eye on it. https://www.skool.com/ai-for-software-business-9941/classroom/00e65a30?md=0fe3f3c40d9e4e7997e49d5e6abbc2eb Btw, we had a small rebranding. It feels like "Agentic architect" had too wide spectrum of meanings.
1
0
We can't rely purely on one tool with it's top model
A few words on my main setup, code review and how to make it more predictable
1
0
Great Days, Fable Found the Gaps I Couldn't See
I ran a full audit of my entire setup with Claude Code's Fable model, and the biggest finding wasn't a technical bug. It was misalignment. Fable went through my Obsidian notes, agent skills, system prompts and website content and surfaced every place where what I was promoting didn't match what I was actually delivering. My offer had inconsistencies across channels. My agent skill descriptions promised things my actual workflows didn't fully support. Even my system prompts had instructions that contradicted each other. I'd been adding layers for months without checking if they still told a coherent story, and Fable made that obvious fast. The real value wasn't in fixing any single thing. It was in seeing the whole system at once and understanding where the cracks were. And it were just a few days. If you're running an AI-augmented solo business with configs, prompts, notes and content spread across multiple tools, you probably have the same problem. Things drift. What you wrote six weeks ago doesn't align with what you built last week. Running an inconsistency audit with Fable gave me a clear hit list and a much tighter offer. Has anyone else done something similar with their setup?
Great Days, Fable Found the Gaps I Couldn't See
1 like • 19d
@Diane Corriette It's blocked on api level, so nobody can access it any more. I was testing it mostly with my agent skills, it fixed many issues that were confusing other AI models. I was using one of the fixed skill today, and results are much higher quality, so real improvement. On the other hand, when I was trying it with with "specify" step of the Spec Driven Development, it didn't follow it's rules. It should only write the specification and ask follow up questions, but instead it wrote specification, made the plan by itself and implemented it.
1-10 of 32
Dominik Gronkiewicz
4
87points to level up
@dominik-gronkiewicz-8905
Software Consulting; Web Development; SEO Conversion and ADA Audits;

Online now
Joined Feb 13, 2026