I recently built an OCR system specifically for mortgage underwriting, and the real-world accuracy is consistently around 96%. This wasn’t a lab benchmark. It’s running in production. For context, most underwriting workflows I saw were using a single generic OCR engine and were stuck around 70–72% accuracy. That low accuracy cascades into manual fixes, rechecks, delays, and large ops teams. By using a hybrid OCR architecture instead of a single OCR, designed around underwriting document types and validation, the firm was able to: • Reduce manual review dramatically • Cut processing time from days to minutes • Improve downstream risk analysis because the data was finally clean • Save ~$2M per year in operational costs The biggest takeaway for me: underwriting accuracy problems are usually not “AI problems”, they’re data extraction problems. Once the data is right, everything else becomes much easier. Happy to answer technical or non-technical questions if anyone’s working in lending or document automation.