McKay, I'm not sure how to word my question. But here goes. Based on what you've said about the 360 system providing "Cross-tethered concepts or phrases" for whatever is being researched -- Does that mean that "Artificial intelligence" works behind the scenes of 360, to not give responses that we might normally get, let's say "on Google", but 360 gives "verbiage" that substitutes words like "gospel" or "grace", into alternate ways of expressing these concepts, so that messages can be formed that are better grasped or understood, from the perspective of the Cross? And if this is the case, maybe some examples of what standard research might provide, versus what 360 provides, would help us better grasp the difference. BTW, when typing into this chat box, mis-spelt words get underlined in red, but there is no correct spelling displayed via either a hover over the word, or via a right-click on it.