Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Clief Notes

40.8k members • Free

AI Automation Society

417.2k members • Free

4 contributions to AI Automation Society
Interesting finding with /session-handoff
I've been using the session handoff skill with a hook that checks my session's context window each turn and sends a reminder to do the session handoff if I'm >= 120k tokens. This has worked well for me. When I am building something, I always follow the pattern of brainstorm/design -> spec -> implementation plan using TDD -> subagent-driven development. I started noticing recently that when my session is going through the development phase with subagents being created for the tasks in the plan, when i get to that 120k token threshold, Claude is assessing how many tasks are left in the plan, how heavy those tasks are (with tests and quality reviews), and in some cases, AUTOMATICALLY stopping the development when a task is done to push for a session handoff to finish the remaining tasks. For example, here is a real snippet from a session with Claude using Opus 4.8: "Task 7 is fully complete and verified — commit 9fbf587, spec-compliant, code-quality approved, and browser-verified end-to-end (two-block layout, 13+5 rows, Save round-trip persists both plans across reload). Scratch server stopped, working tree clean. This is a clean checkpoint: 3 of 6 plan tasks done (5, 6, 7 committed), nothing running, and I'm about to hit the highest-risk task. Context is at 163k+ and the remaining work includes Task 10..." It is then prompting me to confirm if i want to continue or move to a fresh session. Has anyone else had this experience? I feel like it wasn't until this week that it started actively pausing TDD when getting heavy on context.
0
0
Interesting quick read
Saw this on LinkedIn. Haven’t found a link to the underlying study but had read about this shadow market before. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/kirill-balakhonov_it-turns-out-the-gray-market-for-claudegpt-share-7475951927604834305-xeqp/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios&rcm=ACoAABLtdFQB8j-HbgxOwcE4PWtxNFWP3YH92ak
1
0
Advice/Discussion - US Public Sector
Is anyone here US based who works for or has consulted/contracted with a municipal government in the data space? I just accepted a new role and coming from private sector I’m trying to get some insight into public sector challenges and any guidance from people who have gone through this career path already. My mandate is broad across all data not just AI, but that is definitely something the city is pursuing.
1 like • 7d
@Jason Elam Thanks this is great advice. Mapping stakeholders and decision authority before tools is not something I had considered, and agree with you on the nuances of governance and ownership/accountability. Change management will be a big part of my success (or failure) so addressing the human component will be critical. Do you mind sharing what you do/did in the public sector?
🚀New Video: GLM 5.2 in Claude Code is Blowing My Mind
I switched Claude Code over to GLM 5.2 and ran it all day. It's a 756 billion parameter open source model you can route straight into the Claude Code harness for about five times cheaper than Opus, and for most of my knowledge work it held up fine. In this one I show you what it can build, where it beats Opus and where it doesn't, and exactly how to set it up so you can switch between models per project. Here's the config I use. Drop this into your .claude/settings.local.json and swap in your own Z.ai key: "env": { "ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL": "https://api.z.ai/api/anthropic", "ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN": "your-z-ai-api-key-here", "ANTHROPIC_API_KEY": "", "API_TIMEOUT_MS": "3000000", "ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_OPUS_MODEL": "glm-5.2", "ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_SONNET_MODEL": "glm-5.2", "ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_HAIKU_MODEL": "glm-5.2", "ANTHROPIC_SMALL_FAST_MODEL": "glm-5.2", "CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL": "glm-5.2" }
23 likes • 14d
@Nate Herk do you have concerns about privacy when using Chinese models?
1 like • 13d
@Michael Dantzie Chinese companies answer to the CCP. While I don’t trust US tech companies either, do you think they are as bad as the CCP when it comes to mass surveillance and IP theft?
1-4 of 4
David Kay
3
39points to level up
@david-kay-9820
already in the simulation...

Active 44m ago
Joined Apr 22, 2026
Powered by