About the dogs: the underlying idea was to use only untrained stray dogs, because they may surprise and give more believable reactions than the trained or pedigree dogs. Their acting was harder to film (I used 3 cameras all the time) but their acting was over our expectations. However, dogs are funny in the movie only due to the failed human expectations, so they don't do too many doggy silly things. The script was constructed that way from the beginning.

Is there any one interested to watch the entire film?

Hi. My first point is that black and white sets a mood quite far away from what I'd expect from a comedy. My second is that there seems no clear conflict between the policeman and the suspect, hence the dialogue suffers because there is more information exchange than drama. (My take: probably this discussion would be better if it takes place at a psychoanalysis instead of police investigation.) As about the dialogue: Each character line is somehow too long, it's like mini-monologues; I'd make them briefer and give the other some kind of reaction, since there is none now. The jokes are somehow kind of too intelectual - like this is February 31st, which never is; and it's a lot of said - instead of showed. (Ok, I got it: it's due to budget limitations... but viewers don't care about it.) What I'd do: develop all those one-liners into actual scenes, as there is so much comic potential in them. The joke with the printed pistol is visual and good, I'd use more of those. I'd try to cut to more angles, the edit lacks variation right now. Some close-ups, some details, some gestures. You can shoot and add more elements, even without bringing back the initial actors. I hope this helps.