Hi everyone! 👋 I've been diving deeper into AI music lately and I'm curious about something practical: how much do you all typically upload per day or per week? I want to keep growing steadily, but I'd love to avoid pushing too hard and accidentally tripping any spam/shutdown flags on platforms like YouTube, Spotify or DistroKid. If you've found a rhythm that works well for you (and hasn't caused any issues), I'd really appreciate hearing about it! 🙏 Thanks in advance, and hope everyone's releases are going well this week!

Had ChatGPT research the top ten keywords in several different areas. Then picked the keywords I like the most and told ChatGPT to make a song with it. Gonna post this to my YT channel. This is the end results...

i have my youtube in my comments, its where i put my videos of my music, i make the shorts, but im not getting seen, vidiq says im just not being found, i put in the keywords where it tells me, i change my video names to what it says, it only helped a little, right now i got maybe 5k in views, and ive been at it for im wanting to say since may or april, i got a membership to distrokid(musician plan, cant afford a whole lot), and my music is up on spotify since i think july, and i only have around 170 streams, i pitch to playlists, i do what i can, i cant even figure out how to get pitched to itunes. im very frustrated. if i have low numbers then my music isnt being heard by those who might benefit from it, its christian music, which i would also like to monetize, if you are on a fixed income you know how money can be tight and a hobby that might help is always good. help me?

Guerrillas, I want to make this as clear and factual as possible because I do NOT want anybody misunderstanding what I have been doing and showing in my videos. I use search-based strategies myself, but that does NOT mean DistroKid, Spotify, Apple Music, or any other streaming service has approved that strategy. There is also currently NO published DistroKid rule that I have found that says: "Using a keyword automatically gets your DistroKid account banned." I do not want anyone spreading that as fact. But, ⚠️ IF YOU CHOOSE TO USE SEARCH TERMS IN YOUR SONG OR ALBUM TITLES, YOU ARE DOING IT AT YOUR OWN RISK. I AM JUST SHARING WHAT I AM DOING AND WHAT IS WORKING FOR ME. However, DistroKid DOES publish rules that are extremely relevant to this discussion. 📌 DIRECTLY FROM DISTROKID: TITLE FORMATTING DistroKid says streaming services don't accept titles containing: ("Too much extra information" or "Strange things in parentheses") DIRECT DISTROKID SOURCE: https://support.distrokid.com/hc/en-us/articles/360033900034-Release-and-Track-Title-Formatting-Issues DistroKid even gives examples on that page where descriptive genre information added to a title is removed, as well as an example involving an artist-name "type beat" phrase. That is important. DO NOT USE THE WORD "TYPE BEAT" AT ALL! This means that just because a search term accurately describes your song DOES NOT automatically mean adding that term to the title is acceptable metadata. Relevance and metadata compliance are two separate questions. 📌 DIRECTLY FROM DISTROKID: SEARCH TERM FLOODING DistroKid specifically discusses "search term flooding" in its soundtrack rules. DIRECTLY FROM DISTROKID: ("covers should not include 'from' in their titles in reference to the soundtrack they are from, as this is considered search term flooding.") DIRECT DISTROKID SOURCE: https://support.distrokid.com/hc/en-us/articles/29837891947283-Can-I-Upload-Soundtracks

In a recent post "lesson learned" has emerged the possibility of a recent trend of Distrokid to ban (editorial discrection email) account that are using SEO keyword in titles. What Is your take about that? Is that a real risk? Should we change our approach or use some kind of precaution? Is the same using those in titles and in the versione field or Is the latter safer?