I thought it would be useful to bring a real situation from my own community into The Safer Skool Blueprint for us to explore together. I've already handled this situation, but I'm deliberately not going to tell you what I did yet. ๐ I want to hear how you would approach it first. Here's the situation: A new member joins a community centred around trauma healing and support. The community includes trauma impacted people, trauma informed parents and trauma professionals. Importantly, those aren't always separate groups. Many members, myself included, can sit within more than one of those identities. The new member clearly carries a great deal of hurt from previous negative experiences with trauma professionals. That history appears to influence how they interact with me. Because I'm both a trauma professional and the community leader, their communication towards me quickly feels confrontational and aggressive. They attend a live event advertised specifically as a social drop in space, rather than therapy, clinical support or a healing session. During the event, they repeatedly attempt to dominate the conversation and bring their anger and mistrust of trauma professionals into the space. Afterwards, the same pattern continues through comments within the community. Now put yourself in the community owner's chair. ๐ค How would you handle this? What would you be thinking about? Would you intervene during the live event? Would you speak to the member privately afterwards? How would you acknowledge the hurt behind their behaviour without making the wider community responsible for holding it? At what point does understanding why someone behaves a certain way stop being enough to justify allowing the behaviour to continue? How would you consider the needs of the other trauma impacted members and the trauma professionals who also need to feel able to participate safely? And where would your boundary ultimately sit? There isn't one perfect answer. I'd particularly like you to think about this through our four SAFE lenses: