Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
What is this?
Less
More
Memberships
Simon Says AI
3k members • Free
CC Strategic AI
3.3k members • $27/month
Clief Notes
28k members • Free
Aminos Community
6.2k members • Free
Machine Room
620 members • Free
17 contributions to Clief Notes
Mar 15 •
🏁 Foundations 3.1 Check-In
You just watched the full 23-minute folder architecture walkthrough. Vote below, then drop your use case in the comments. What are you building this system around?
Poll
554 members have voted
0 likes • 2d
I've been reading a lot of documents that discuss similar versions of this logic. And I'm just trying to get my head around something that seems a little bit different to me based on what I saw in the file structures in 3.1. Some folks who are talking about a similar sort of structured file system show having a Claude MD file at each folder level. It appears to me that what we're talking about in this video is one principal Claude MD file and then defining the context MD files throughout the folders below it. It would seem to me that, as long as the initial ClaudeMD file explained where to go when you get to a new file level, you wouldn't necessarily need multiple ClaudeMD files throughout a file structure. In my mind, that makes it a little easier to think about and a bit more logical. But is that an appropriate assumption? Or is the question even a little more complex, and the answer that you have a specific Claude MD file anywhere in the file structure that it makes sense to do it? And what are the criteria that help you understand when it makes sense versus when context MD files are fine? Yes, I'm still wrapping my head around the orchestration aspect of it. And it probably comes down to how you tune that orchestration. But if anybody has some feedback on the right way to start thinking about this, I'd greatly appreciate it.
0 likes • 21h
@Marigold Henshaw I'm the CFO of a small venture studio. We've got a relatively interesting corporate structure that includes a couple of holding companies and several operating entities. The upper levels are mostly legal documents, accounting projects, research projects, things of that nature. At the operating companies things get more interesting in terms of the work flows that actually take place around the management and operations of the companies, as well as research and analysis related to the individual companies and the industries they operate in. There would be some workflows that are consistent or at least similar among operating entities. In my mind I'm envisioning a folder structure that mirrors the corporate organizational structure, then within each entity level there would be folder structures that accommodate the various workflows at each entity. It may be biting off more than I should chew as a project while I'm trying to really learn and internalize this process.
Mar 15 •
🏁 Foundations 3.3 Check-In
Everyone gets something wrong the first time. Vote below, then drop your mistake in the comments so others can learn from it.
Poll
288 members have voted
0 likes • 2d
I've got three major buckets in my vault structure: 1. One that relates mostly to corporate organization and structuring. 2. One that relates to a specific entity within the structure that we're developing and for which I'm the CFO. 3. I've got a third bucket that's based on some stuff that my son and I want to do together to finance some fishing trips and things that we want to be able to do together. I've been trying to organize this general structure that way. I think I'm over complicating it with things I know. I'm wondering about maybe just focusing on the third bucket and building small and learning. It might be easiest to start small and learn from there and then take what I learn to focus on the file structures for the more serious parts of the vault.
👑
⭐
11d •
🎉 New Course: Davids Corner
🎉 Meet your new admin: @David Vogel Some of you have been watching this happen in real time. David has been quietly turning his "Show Your Work" posts into one of the most useful threads in this community for months. Resource roundups, deep-dives, honest takes on what's actually working in production. No fluff. No hype. 🛠️ So I gave him the keys. 🔑 David is now an admin of Clief Notes, and he has his own classroom: 🏛️ David's Corner. Go check it out. AI Acronym Overload? Here's the Cheat Sheet - Davids Corner 📂 What's in David's Corner He started with the resource post a lot of you bookmarked last week and has been steadily expanding it. As of right now you'll find: 🔥 Must Have Resources - 🎨 Looking for design inspiration? - 🧠 AI Acronym Overload? Here's the Cheat Sheet - ⭐ Some of My Favorite Resources 📚 Learning for Everyone - 🥊 Obsidian is BLOAT! Batter Up - 💰 Flip the Script — It's all about the $$$ - 👻 Do You Have a Soul? - 🔄 My AI Workflow Evolution 👨💻 Developer Resources - 🕵️ LEAKED: Ten Prompts from Experts - ⚡ Introducing the Hermes Stack 🎯 David and Jakes Picks (this one's going to grow) Plus he's curating trusted YouTube channels and a running list of favorite community posts on resources inside the corner. So if you wrote something good about a tool, a stack, or a workflow, that's where it might end up. 👀 He's adding more weekly. If something stops delivering, he wants to hear about it. That's how the corner stays sharp. 🔪 💡 Why this matters The Vault and The Drawing Room give you my methodology. David's Corner gives you a second lens. Same standards (battle-tested, no theory, no marketing slides), different angle. He's been in the trenches with tools and stacks, and he writes about them honestly. ✅ What you can do 1. 🔖 Go bookmark David's Corner in the classroom 2. 💬 Drop a comment under his posts when something works (or doesn't) 3. 📨 Got a resource that should be in there? Tag him. He's curating.
1 like • 11d
Congrats David!!
Mar 15 •
🏁 Foundations 2.6 Check-In
You just saw how video production turns into code. Vote below, then tell us in the comments: what is one repetitive creative task in your work that could become a pipeline?
Poll
396 members have voted
0 likes • 16d
Question if anyone knows - Have recent drops to Claude Code removed the need for Cursor and/or VSCode as used in this session? I saw a comment about that back in Section 1, but I still don't fully understand the lay of the land in this regard. Thanks in advance!
0 likes • 15d
@Eric Bell Thanks for the reply, it made sense. I just started session 3.1 and saw something Jake added "You do not need VS Code to do any of this. You can work inside your regular file explorer, create folders, create text files, and edit them in Notepad or any text editor. You can also use Claude Cowork, which operates inside folders the same way. VS Code is just cleaner for managing lots of files. If it feels overwhelming, skip it for now and use whatever you are comfortable with." Seems like Anthropic does have a native path at this time, but it never hurts to learn something new that is not captive. Thanks again!
Mar 15 •
🏁 Foundations 2.7 Check-In
This one traces AI auditing instruments back to places most people don't expect. Vote below, then tell us in the comments: what surprised you most about where these tools came from?
Poll
341 members have voted
1 like • 15d
All I could hear in my head was was Roger Daltrey's voice - "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss"
1-10 of 17
