And for a good reason. [ROAST ANOTHER AI RANT] I got a "community expert" approaching me saying that he would help me scale my community and wanting to disclose his services. I said I was interested in seeing what he offered. He than sent me a PDF diagnosis of my group. It was very very bad. It sugested implementing stuff that I already do very well in a creative way and gave very generic and bland ideas to replace them, like the leaderboard level names, for example. The guy most problably just ran the agent and didn't take a minute to look at my group himself. And I just got to know that Skool and social media are flooding with those consultants. That just creates a reputation that everything that has AI on it is managed by a lazy person or scammer behind it. Now people accuse canva designs of being AI. Scriped videos as being AI. CGI of being AI. Even basic photoshop edits are now AI slop. And it comes with a repulse because the people behind it are seen as lazy like those consultants no matter what they are delivering. Since we're managing communities we have the unique opportunity to break that pattern, because people can connect with us on a level that they can't on modern social media. But the first impression is still very important. Unfortunatelly, if you're using AI for your group images without showing the person behind it, no matter how cool it looks and how much real effort you put behind it, some people will just assume you're a lazy person who uses AI to deliver everything.

@Dave Hughes won the Roaster of the Week again. He is always helping people with their groups here, being the first one to give them the feedback they crave for (and that multuplies your points) and really really puttiing an effort on his roasts. So if he helped you here, you must go to Skool Reset & Rebuild for further assistance from him. Here is what you get there: ✅ Community setup or community audit ✅ Skool help to get members ✅ About Page rewrite + page optimization ✅ Niche positioning + clear messaging ✅ Attract members + improve member engagement ✅ Better member experience + community growth ✅ Brand Identity & Ideal Client Deep Dive ✅ Personalized roadmap WANT MORE HELP? 1:1 coaching Dave: Personalized Skool coaching, weekly private coaching + accountability. 2:1 coaching Dave + Nancy: Weekly coaching, hands-on implementation + an engagement specialist who posts and replies. ⭐ PROOF: One About Page rewrite lifted opt-in conversion by 3.7%. Join now!

Check it out: https://www.skool.com/roast-promote-5332/about And feel free to review my group at: https://proveworth.com/community/roast-promote. @Matthew Burns created this amazing review tool that you can use even if you're not a paid member. Thank you again @Lidia Axe @Roberto Srpak @Dr. Severine Bryan @Rb Rathore @Lydia Lowery Busler @Aimee Jardon @Heather Boers @Rb Rathore and @Toivo Mattila !

I played both. Prefered YougiOh. But magic was much more popular for some reason. Anyway here are the most legendary Magic cards from the champions of the Roaster of the Week competition this month. @Dave Hughes :the human coach wizard of the Skool Reset & Rebuild Kingdom @Brian Walsh :the Community Alchemist of the Skool Nerds Guild @Eliot Payne :the Great Merchant of the The Marketing Common Room Castle @Eric William :the Futuristic inventor of the AI SEO Content & Traffic Labs! A new month just started and the scores are cleared for everyone. And all the members are competing. Are you in?

When trying to sell something online there is a level of trust you can give people and there are stuff you can do to increase it with the people who stumble upon you. At the lowest level most people will either think you're a scammer or see you as an amateur who is not worth investing on. At this level I'll also keep myself from promoting you. So you're not competing for Roaster of the Week if I can't trust your offer. At least create a non generic landing page to display it in a clear way and show who is behind it. That's the least you should do for me to trust you. What is the level you consider yourself MOSTLY at?