@Lisa Carroll I’m still very much figuring out the second part. The doubt is still there, and I’ve realised it has made me hypervigilant — not only about the advice I give or the work I produce, but about completely ordinary interactions within the team. If everyone goes for lunch, can I just not go because I don’t feel like it, or will that be interpreted as me not making an effort or me not fitting in? It is pervasive. It starts taking over everything. When I tried to speak out, I realized how micromanagement takes the form of micro-aggressions: each incident on its own can seem so small that, if you explain it to someone else, they might genuinely think you’re overreacting or being difficult. But when you experience these things repeatedly, the cumulative effect is completely different. At the beginning, I confided in a few colleagues and was basically told to take the “path of least resistance.” I thought that was good advice at first — adapt, choose your battles, don’t react to everything. Now I’m wondering where the line is between adapting and slowly losing myself in the process. I’ve also become much more careful about what I share with my closest-colleagues as I’ve realized that things travel. “If you are silent, they will kill you and say you enjoyed it.” How do you address a pattern of behaviour towards you when each individual incident seems too small to raise without sounding dramatic or difficult? Especially when that person is more established within the team. My approach: (try to) keep my head down, do the work, and document my efforts and contributions so that when feedback comes, I can respond with facts and concrete examples rather than trying to reconstruct everything afterwards. But I still struggle with the bigger question: when does adapting stop being resilience and start becoming self-erasure? And if the answer is eventually to leave, is that protecting yourself — or does some part of you inevitably feel like you let the other person take the opportunity from you?