Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Carsten

KI-Praxis Masterclass

22 members • $9/month

KI endlich verstehen und nutzen, im Business und im Alltag. Klare Grundlagen, Prompts und Workflows. EU-AI-Act-Kurs bis zum KI-Kompetenz-Nachweis.

9 contributions to Lovable Ai
Vibe coding didn’t invent programming. It just skipped the part where you learn it.
Everyone’s out here hoarding “Claude skills” and vibe-coding cheat sheets like there’s some secret trick to make AI build good UI. There isn’t a trick. You just don’t have a dev background — so you don’t know what to actually ask for. That’s the whole gap. Here’s what I mean. Vibe coding didn’t invent animation libraries. Didn’t invent icon sets. Didn’t invent fonts. Those have existed for years, built by real developers, sitting there the whole time. All vibe coding did was shorten the typing. So I stopped talking to Lovable like a customer and started talking to it like a developer. Installed the exact packages a real dev would install. Named the exact libraries a real dev would name. And Lovable just… acted like a programmer. Built it clean, first try. Voilà. What do you think — anything here you’d push further? Comment “SLOP” and I’ll send you the prompt. (PAID)
Vibe coding didn’t invent programming. It just skipped the part where you learn it.
1 like • Aug 3
Corresponds with my own experience, being a programmer my whole life makes it so much easier to develop with vibe coding. Not to forget a lot of serious security issues vibes coding produces, if you don’t know how to build properly. It’s getting better for non-coders, but especially lovable has produced a lot of serious glitches in the past.
Why did medieval kings pay a guy whose entire job was to laugh at them?
Not a riddle. The court jester was a real, salaried position. Here's the thing: every minister, advisor, and noble in the room agreed with everything the king said — because the last guy who disagreed is now a cautionary tale. So the smart kings hired one man who was legally allowed to tell them their ideas sucked. They paid for disagreement. Because agreement was free, and worthless. Fast forward 600 years, and congratulations — you're the king now. Your AI is the throne room. Stanford just ran a study showing AI agrees with you 49% more than an actual human would. Read that again. You're paying $20/month for the world's most articulate yes-man. Ask it if you should pivot your business and it'll say "brilliant idea, king" — even when your idea is objectively terrible. Especially when your idea is objectively terrible, because it already knows what you want to hear. You don't have an advisor. You have a mirror with a thesaurus. The fix comes from Andrej Karpathy — OpenAI founding member, now at Anthropic, certified AI goat. He built something called the LLM Council. I ripped his GitHub repo, tore through the files, and packaged the whole thing into one skill you trigger with a single command. Type /LLM-Council and five advisors walk into your throne room: 🗡️ The Contrarian — only looks at how this fails 🧠 The First-Principles Thinker — shreds every assumption you walked in with 📈 The Expansionist — finds the upside you're too scared to see 👁️ The Outsider — knows nothing about your industry, which is exactly why he sees what you can't ✅ The Executor — doesn't care about your vision, only what you're doing Monday at 9am Then the fun part: each advisor reviews the others' answers blind — no idea who wrote what. No politics, no ego, just arguments getting stress-tested. Finally, a Chairman walks in, weighs everything, and hands you a verdict + next steps. And for the purists: I'll also show you how to run it faithful to Karpathy's original design — spawning the agents across different models (GPT, Gemini, Grok, Claude) so you're not just getting five clones of the same brain arguing with itself.
Why did medieval kings pay a guy whose entire job was to laugh at them?
2 likes • Jul 19
Council
🔨 Weekly Build Thread — What Are You Working On This Week?
Every Monday, same question. What are you building this week? Drop a comment below. One line or ten — doesn’t matter. Show the thing you’re working on. Ask a question. Share a blocker. If you’re stuck, say where. Someone here has probably been stuck in the same place. Here’s the format if you want structure: 🔨 Building: [what you’re working on] 🧱 Stuck on: [what’s blocking you — or “nothing, making progress”] 💡 Tip from last week: [one thing you learned that others might find useful] You don’t have to have something finished. You don’t have to have something impressive. You just have to show up. The builders who get the most from this community are the ones who post before they have all the answers — not after. Reply to someone else’s comment if you’ve solved what they’re stuck on. That’s the whole point of this place. This thread resets every Monday. See you here. 🚀
3 likes • Jun 19
I'm working on an online test for the europen AI Competence Guideline. The Masterclass is already setup an running. So far I am ready to (vibe) code, just not sure if I will use Lovable. While Lovable is extremly good and easy to use for small projects and the project setup with database and everything is pretty convenient, I had some seriuos issues with my last development (AI Launchpad for Launches), data inconsitensy even though Lovable had assured me that my prompt architecture had been implemented exactly as specified. A test scenario (requirements specification, 500 pages of Lovable Chat, and the repository, done by Claude Fable) then revealed that Lovable had not followed my requirements specification at all and had been given me false information the whole time about the implementation; instead, it had created security vulnerabilities, did not use my designed prompt architecure for consistency (each function bypassed it not using the former findings) and Lovable had also connected to the AI API without protection, contrary to my instructions. Lovable security check gave green light and other security checks on Lovable also did not flag anything.
I built something this week and I want your honest opinion.
I came across a post about a fencing company that built an automated lead generation system. 3 to 7 qualified appointments every single day. Automatically. I thought — what if I built the same thing for flooring businesses? So I did. In a few hours. Watch the video. Here's what it does: → Customer uploads a photo of their room → Sees exactly how the new floor looks — before and after → Gets an instant price range → Receives an SMS + email automatically → Books a consultation in one click The sales team gets every lead in real time with full details. No phone tag. No waiting. No lost customers. Built with Lovable AI + Supabase + Twilio + Resend + Calendly. Now here's the part I'm excited about — This week I'm doing cold outreach to real flooring businesses with this demo. I'm going to try to close an actual client and document everything. The wins, the rejections, the lessons. I'll share it all here. So tell me — do you think a flooring business would pay for something like this? And what other industries would you build this for? Drop your answers below 👇
I built something this week and I want your honest opinion.
1 like • May 19
Cool idea. Are you planing to license or sell the software?
This is why I love Lovable.
One prompt to Lovable. One prompt to Google Veo. And you have a website that people used to pay thousands of dollars for. Right now I just finished building the hero section of a full vodka brand website called The Outliers. Every step of the workflow is documented and available for free in the classroom. Go read it, go apply it, because soon it will cost money. Tomorrow we move to section two and I will drop the full documentation there too. Worth following closely. This is how you build a website you can sell to clients. From zero to a complete product in days not months. Zero technical knowledge required. Go check it out. https://immersive-hero-build.lovable.app/
This is why I love Lovable.
1 like • Mar 26
that is awesome, I love lovable, it makes it so easy. I’m building a website for an online challenge for my german community and even using the website builder in my funnel system would take much longer.
1 like • Mar 26
@Eliya Elmakis I‘m already on it… ;)
1-9 of 9
Carsten Wehrle
2
1 point to level up
@carsten-wehrle
Ich helfe Solo-Experten, mit KI ein Business aufzubauen, das zu ihrer Persönlichkeit passt - Klick auf 🔗

Online now
Joined Jan 10, 2026
INFJ