@Ronaldo Tkotz Going to check them! thanks for the recommendations, Learned about Escher when studied Photography, never though I will come back to it when talking about AI, 25 years later 😅

@Jake Van Clief I loved the article, that is exactly what I was questioning myself. So it's an old human wonder after all. The interesting thing is the fact that our tools are finally forcing us to take the old question seriously. That Lovelace/Turing tension is exactly what I was trying to get at: if we say machines do not originate because they transform prior inputs, then we also have to ask how much of human originality is transformation of prior inputs too. Thanks for sharing 🥰

I feel I am doing baby steps, but baby steps are none the less movement ahead, so lets just keep going and see where it all lands. I did a custom app with vibe coding for a consulting client, to manage all their clients, and now I want to redo it applying this structure, to make it more manageable, and replicable as well. Trying to understand the basis to develop a system for any other thing I build. I wonder then, I have been using AI to create all the .md files, so, would be interesting then to create a base-project whose function is actually to create the foundational folders and files of any project?

@Tristan Bolle what if we actually are just a more evolved type of LLM's, trained since birth, with thousands and thousands years of development, with more input sources (5 senses, so 5x different languages combined), and what we call consciousness is just a a more sophisticated form of programming?

@Tristan Bolle I think is a bit late for the mental part XD

This video made my brain explode XD. I have audiovisuals' background, and lately I was talking about how much money is the table for whoever is able to develop an automated system for visual production and editing. The first part is already being tackled, somewhat, but you actually found a very clever way for the animation part. I guess video creation with AI is less predictable, so it will require more tweaks. Editing still in early stages, I've seen some intents, and there can be a basic cut, remove silences, change video size purposefully... but still missing the human ability to create emotion, by just holding one frame for a second, i.e. What a time to be alive tough, looking forward to see the evolution of this process!

So, I totally get the 60/30/10 concept, and I agree with it so deeply, as I couldn't understand why people were ditching automations (n8n), and instead handed everything to Claude, as I was thinking... There is always a fixed process that would be more reliable and cheaper if it is already established (and it could be set up using AI till certain level), and then just add AI in the parts were is really needed. But no sure if I am missing something, or building walls myself in the process. With openclaw, I also don't completely get it... Is just a connector, so, do we really need it? Wouldn't be better if we create our own access/connection system? As we can control the security and the reach of it? It makes me feel like when people access apps and tools always through the google login option... I'm like: damn! If your google account gets hacked, you go down with everything! Maybe with openclaw this can be fixed just by creating a secure enviroment, local machine, limited permissions, etc. But I am still not sold to it. This are just questions coming from a total illiterate in engineering or development.. So be gentle with me XD