Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
What is this?
Less
More
3 contributions to Your legal help
THE BARRISTER'S CLASSROOM: CAN YOU RESIGN AND STILL BRING AN UNFAIR DISMISSAL CLAIM?
⚖️ 💼 Today's Topic: Constructive Dismissal Explained Did you know that in certain circumstances, an employee who resigns may still be able to bring an unfair dismissal claim? This is known as constructive dismissal. Let's break it down. 1️⃣ What is constructive dismissal? Constructive dismissal occurs where an employee resigns in response to a fundamental breach of contract by their employer. In simple terms, the employer's conduct must be sufficiently serious to justify the employee treating the contract as having been brought to an end. 2️⃣ Does every disagreement with an employer amount to constructive dismissal? No! An employee being unhappy at work, having a disagreement with their manager or feeling undervalued does not automatically establish constructive dismissal. There must generally be a fundamental breach of contract. 3️⃣ What might amount to a fundamental breach? Depending on the circumstances, examples could include: A substantial unilateral reduction in salary. Serious bullying or harassment by management. A significant change to contractual duties without agreement. Failure to address serious workplace misconduct. Conduct demonstrating that the employer no longer intends to honour an essential contractual obligation. Each case must be assessed on its own facts. 4️⃣ Does the employee have to resign immediately? An employee who delays resigning may risk being treated as having affirmed the contract, although the effect of any delay depends on the circumstances. Taking legal advice before resigning is therefore important. 5️⃣ Can an employee claim compensation? Potentially, yes. However, the employee must establish the necessary legal elements and satisfy the applicable eligibility and procedural requirements. Employment tribunal time limits are particularly important. An employee should seek advice promptly. 🎓 STUDENT CHALLENGE: THINK LIKE AN EMPLOYMENT LAWYER! Consider this scenario: Maria has worked for the same company for five years as an office manager.
1 like • 9d
Maria’s dissatisfaction alone does not establish constructive dismissal, as she must demonstrate that her employer committed a fundamental breach of contract. The gradual change from office management responsibilities to reception and tea bar duties could amount to such a breach if it significantly altered her contractual role or undermined the implied duty of mutual trust and confidence. However, the fact that she continued working under these conditions for approximately two years could weaken her claim, as her conduct may suggest that she accepted the changes and affirmed the contract. Nevertheless, this would depend on whether she raised objections or whether the final disagreement formed part of a continuing pattern of conduct. Before advising Maria, I would ask whether she agreed to the changes, raised any grievances, experienced a reduction in her managerial responsibilities, and what specifically triggered her resignation. I would also examine her employment contract, job description, correspondence, grievance records and resignation letter. Ultimately, her claim would depend on whether the employer’s conduct amounted to a fundamental breach, whether she resigned in response to it, and whether she had affirmed the contract.
SOMEONE OWES YOU MONEY AND WON'T PAY. WHAT CAN YOU DO?
⚖️ **LEGAL TIP OF THE DAY: SOMEONE OWES YOU MONEY AND WON'T PAY. WHAT CAN YOU DO?** Have you ever lent someone money, completed work for a client, or supplied goods to a customer — only to find that they refuse to pay you back? You are not alone! 💷 But before you rush to court, there are some important steps you should consider. Here are five practical tips to help you understand your options. **1️⃣ Gather your evidence** Find any written agreement, invoices, receipts, bank statements, emails and text messages relating to the debt. Even where there is no formal written contract, other evidence may help establish what was agreed. **2️⃣ Make a clear written request for payment** Explain how much is owed, why it is owed and when you expect payment. Keep a copy of your correspondence. A calm, professional approach may resolve the dispute without court proceedings. **3️⃣ Consider a letter before claim** If payment is still not made, a formal letter before claim may be appropriate. It should explain the basis of the claim, the amount sought and the action required. Depending on the type of dispute, a pre-action protocol may apply and set out additional requirements. **4️⃣ Don't rush into issuing a court claim** Before starting proceedings, consider whether you have sufficient evidence, whether the other person has a defence, the relevant limitation period, the court fee and whether the debt can realistically be recovered. Winning a judgment and actually recovering the money are two different things. **5️⃣ Know your options** Depending on the circumstances, you may be able to negotiate a repayment plan, use mediation or bring a civil claim. The appropriate route depends on the amount owed, the nature of the agreement and the evidence available. 💡 **THE BARRISTER'S TIP** Never assume that because someone owes you money, getting it back will be straightforward. Good evidence, clear communication and following the correct procedure can make a real difference.
1 like • 18d
A- I would first send a formal written request asking for repayment within a reasonable timeframe, referring to the agreed repayment date and the evidence of the loan. This gives my friend an opportunity to settle the debt without court proceedings.
STUDENT CORNER: THINK LIKE A LAWYER — WOULD YOU TAKE THE CASE?
⚖️ 🎓 Today's Challenge: The Client Who Wants to Sue One of the most important skills in law is learning not to accept a client's version of events without proper investigation. A client may feel they have a strong case. But is there enough evidence to support it? Let's test your skills! 📝 THE SCENARIO David visits a solicitor and explains that he was dismissed from his job after working for the same employer for four years. He believes his dismissal was unfair because his manager disliked him. David says he was called into a meeting and told that his employment was ending immediately. He was not given any written explanation. He wants to bring a claim against his former employer and demands that his lawyer start court proceedings immediately. However, David has not brought any documents to the meeting. He has not explained whether there were previous disciplinary warnings, whether he was given a chance to respond to the allegations against him, or whether he appealed the decision. ⚖️ YOUR TASK Imagine you are the lawyer conducting David's initial interview. Question 1: Identify the issues What potential legal issues arise from David's account? Question 2: Ask the right questions What are the first five questions you would ask David before advising him on the merits of his case? Question 3: Identify the evidence What documents or other evidence would you request from David or his former employer? Question 4: Manage the client's expectations David insists that he has an obvious case and wants you to guarantee that he will win. How would you respond professionally? Question 5: Consider urgency What time limits or procedural requirements would you need to investigate before deciding on the next step? 💡 BONUS CHALLENGE David says, "I've worked there for four years, so they cannot dismiss me without a good reason." Is that statement necessarily correct? Explain your answer. 🎯 WHAT THIS EXERCISE TEACHES YOU A good lawyer does not simply agree with the client. A good lawyer:
2 likes • 18d
The main issue is whether David was unfairly dismissed under section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Having worked for four years, he would ordinarily qualify to bring a claim. However, we need to establish whether his employer had a fair reason for dismissing him and whether a proper disciplinary procedure was followed, including giving him an opportunity to respond and appeal. There may also be a claim for wrongful dismissal if he was dismissed without notice or notice pay. We would need to investigate whether his manager’s dislike was linked to discrimination or another unlawful reason. Simply being disliked by his manager does not automatically make the dismissal unfair.
1-3 of 3
Blessing Ayeni
1
1 point to level up
@blessing-ayenj-4718
Unregistered Barrister

Active 2d ago
Joined Oct 17, 2026