“Too bad we have to type our arguments. It would be much more fun and effective if we were talking over a meal, the most delicious form of energy in nature.” Is that an offer for a date, King? :)) I am in Canada now, but I will return to Istanbul soon. Come to Istanbul and be my guest for one of the best meals in the world. By the way, one of the most delicious forms of energy in nature is also making love, right? But I am totally straight, and I think you are too.:)) I am also trying to be ethical about it. Without falling in love, we cannot make love, King. :)) So sharing a meal with a deep and passionate conversation on a Theory of Everything seems to be the best and only option at hand, I guess. :) Okay, enough joking. Jokes aside, King, I agree that typing does not fully reveal our ideas or personalities. Not enough information flows through text alone. What impresses me most about you is that you have the strength to reject PhDs and academic titles. As for me, even though I only have a bachelor’s degree in economics, I was also offered some academic positions. But since I am not well suited to working under strict direction, I have always preferred to be an autodidact in the other disciplines I am involved with. I have always felt that I can make compromises only for love, not for sociological or economic benefits. “I had done the mapping between philosophy, religion, theology, and science, resulting in the theory of everything. Much of this mapping involved deconstruction, destroying nonsense such as being, noumena, time, and what not. You don’t get caught up in these webs. You burn them with all the energy you have until you have nothing left except for the essence of existence: energy. You can’t get rid of energy because you would need energy first to get rid of energy.” I knew that I had understood you correctly. I fully agree with what you mean here. What you dont get is I am not an academic, or a fan of them, who merely memorizes ideas and repeats them in order to survive. It is impossible to reach the absolute through such methods. One cannot tunnel or jump to truth through formal logic and contingent information, even when it is rendered systematic.

"1) re the TOE and your comment on psychoanalysis and consciousness, we should perhaps introduce the idea of hierarchy as well to mirror the hierarchical structure in nature: there’s a hierarchical structure of theories within the TOE, my TOE being about particle physics and cosmology, i.e. fundamental reality. Only once this fundamental reality has been confirmed can we hope to figure out other levels of theories concerning chemistry, biology, etc., including consciousness." I agree, King. Only a layered model can function as a TOE, because reality itself has many layers. Purely mechanical physical laws are not sufficient to explain all of them. Saying “it’s all physics” or “it’s all consciousness” has the same explanatory power, insofar as reality must somehow pass from one level to another. From the perspective that reality is one and whole, these domains must exhibit some form of isomorphism with respect to each other. "2) your stubborn lack of understanding of the concept of energy is truly astounding to me, what a betrayal to all the delicious Turkish food that exists in this world! Without correcting your disrespectful attitude towards energy, we can hardly pursue a meaningful conversation: my entire theory or life is based on three words — all is energy. The rest is just to draw out the logical consequences of this absolute truth." :)) I am equally surprised that you cannot see that what I am saying about energy is entirely legitimate. I agree that all is energy. All is one. All is consciousness. All is nature. I can show how these are interrelated and convertible into one another. I am quite sure that, once we communicate further, you will find nothing objectionable in what I said about energy. "3) The title of King: you are familiar with Plato, so you should be the last person on the planet to call me King as you know too well the meaning of a philosopher king." Why not? A philosopher-king is the one who leaves the cave, embraces the Sun (truth), and returns to the cave out of duty, not out of a desire to rule. If you are the kind of man I think you are, then you deserve to be called a King.