The Not So Fashionable Made With AI Labels Listen, AI is getting messier. Yesterday, Anthropic didn’t drop a new model but instead a new initiative to implement digital watermarking for all content produced by its Claude AI models. This decision was made possible by the European Union’s AI Act, new AI legistration that mandates clear identification for machine-generated media. The technology embeds identifiable markers directly into the text, ensuring that the label remains intact even if the material is copied, pasted, and moved to different platforms, or your notes app or Google Drive How did we get here? The last three years in the AI era, have been plagued by AI slop and what Substack CEO Chris Best aptly dubbed "Claudefishing" where AI-generated content is passed off as human brilliance without any disclosure. Bottom line, people’s eyes and brains are tired of the junk. Here’s what you need to know: 🧠You Can’t Wash The Watermark Away This isn't just a metadata tag that can be removed with a right-click; it’s integrated into the "DNA" of the copy itself through statistical patterns in word choice. The takeaway here is that the "clean" copy-paste workflow is dead. The frauds and scammer experts will eventually get exposed. The watermark is embedded in the content's structure; it moves with the text. “Because the watermark is part of the text, it will travel with the text when it’s copied and pasted elsewhere, and may persist through some editing. Watermarking will be applied at the model level, which means it will be present no matter which Claude product or surface the text comes from.” - Anthropic 🧠Europe Leads Again In AI Policy - "Article 50" is the New Global Standard Article 50 of the EU AI Act is a mandate enforced by National Market Surveillance Authorities and AI Office. It forces a sharp legal distinction between "Providers" (the labs like Anthropic) and "Deployers" (the businesses and people using the AI). To avoid massive penalties, the law requires explicit disclosure for any system that could deceive or manipulate.

Hi all- I really want to develop thought leaderships…I was thinking of using Chat to guide me but was wondering if @Jeneba Wint or Prompt Party fam could suggest other apps? Chat knows me the best, but I really like how Claude organizes thing…

The tea this week: the whole industry just admitted the thing we've been building around. For two years the pitch was "learn to use AI." This week the research caught up to what we already knew in this room, using it isn't the same as being able to judge it, and even more importantly, discerning when to even use AI. Here's what I'm loving, side-eyeing, and watching. As always, I'm telling you how I'd check each one before I trust it. That part is the point. 💛 Loving Somebody finally measured the "looks fluent, actually fragile" gap. A study out last month found people can get really good at making things with AI before they understand it well enough to catch when it's wrong. Researchers called it the "skill bypass" you look advanced because your output looks advanced, but the judgment underneath never got built. Read that again, because it's the entire reason Prompt Party changed direction. The goal isn't to look fluent. We're here to make you actually able to tell when the output is good, when it's off, and when it quietly flattened your voice. 💛 Also Loving The best prompters aren't the ones with clever prompts. Anthropic looked at nearly 10,000 real conversations and found fluency isn't a good prompt it's a pattern. Frame, generate, inspect, challenge, repair, verify, integrate. The people getting real value aren't asking once and accepting the answer. They're staying in the loop. This is Think Before You Prompt™ with receipts. The magic was never the prompt. It's you staying in the room while the work happens. 👀 Side-Eyeing The "AI is coming for your job" headlines got a hard number this week and it's not the whole story. Around 40,000 bank jobs are being cut with AI named as the driver. Real, and I won't pretend it isn't. But two other reports this week put it in focus: the split isn't "AI takes jobs" or "AI makes jobs." It's both and the dividing line is judgment. The people on the winning side aren't the ones who use AI the most. They're the ones who can direct it, govern it, and explain their reasoning when it matters. Passive users are exposed. Directors are not.

Hey everyone Welcome to the 101 to Vibe Coding you didn't know you needed. You've watched the demos. You've bought the tools. You've seen everyone chasing the trends and having squirell moments. You've opened Lovable, Bolt, ChatGPT, Claude, Replit — sometimes all in the same week and you still do not have a product you can show someone. What separates the people shipping from the people stuck is one thing: a structured way to think before they prompt. That is what this challenge helps. In 10 days. For $10. What Happens in 10 Days You go from a vague idea to a tested, viable product concept with a working prototype, a documented design system, and a TASTE-calibrated standard for evaluating your own work from here. The Format - 5 Live Nights · 90 minutes each · Days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 · 6:30–8:30 PM ET - 5 Async Days · structured assignments with one specific deliverable each - 1 Demo Day · optional paid add-on · pitch what you built - All sessions recorded for replay You Are Not Alone in This This is not a course you watch alone at midnight. This is a cohort. You will be in a working room with founders, creatives, executives, and AI-curious operators who are tired of building in isolation. You will hear two other people's product thesis on Day 1. You will watch someone else's prototype struggle on Day 7. You will feel the relief of being in a room where everyone is choosing to think harder before they ship. The room is the product. The cohort is the proof you are not the only one. Who This Is For - The complete beginner who has been waiting for a runway long enough to actually build something - The AI-curious non-builder — founder, creative, operator who is tired of the gap between idea and creating something you've had in your head. - The experienced prompter who can generate beautiful outputs but does not yet have a framework to evaluate them What You Walk Away With 1. A tested product— built in any AI tool you choose (Lovable, Bolt, Figma, Replit, ChatGPT) 2. A product thesis specific enough to build from — and to sell from 3. A user profile precise enough to design for 4. A system map of the ecosystem your product enters 5. A documented visual direction you can hand to any builder 6. A TASTE scorecard — the standard you will use to evaluate every product decision from here 7. A 5-minute pitch you can deliver in front of any room

Welcome to the room you’ve been waiting for. We saved you a seat at the table! We don’t care so much about your LinkedIn headline; we care about what you’re building. To unlock your first bit of "proof" in this community, introduce yourself using the 30-Second Win format. Copy/Paste this into a new post in the "Introductions" category: Headline: [Your Name] is in the building! - Location: - - Current Role or Title: - Background: (Tell us a little about your journey) - Most used AI tool, platform or use case: - What you're hoping to learn or do with AI: - LinkedIn profile link: - IG or Threads links: - MY FIRST RECEIPT: I just asked AI: "Give me a 1-sentence prompt to [Solve a minor problem you have today]" - Here is what it gave me: [Paste the AI output or attach a screenshot] Note on Points: Posts with "Receipts" (screenshots or pasted output) get way more love (and points) than just saying "Hi!" or "Great post!" Let’s see those messy first drafts!