Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

52 contributions to Spiritual Rebels
Opposing views to reincarnation?
I don't really buy the reincarnation thing, though it does mess with me that some people believe in past lives. What are some opposing views you have with reincarnation?
1 like • 18d
@Erhard H. I don’t think you’re actually seeking Truth. What you’re doing looks more like being obsessed with something you’ve already decided is Truth. You say that Truth exists independently of what we believe. But that also means that none of us can simply decide what Truth is - based on a personal experience, such as visions, no matter how powerful it felt. And I’m not questioning that such an experience is real or meaningful. But it doesn’t automatically make it Truth. It just makes it YOUR experience. When you build your entire understanding of reality around that experience, it stops being a search. It becomes a belief system you’re holding onto. And once you start structuring your entire life around that belief, it doesn’t just shape your perspective, it locks it into a single direction. At that point, you’re no longer really open to Truth, you’re committed to protecting a conclusion. Which also means you might be closing yourself off from the possibility that the actual Truth could be something entirely different from what your experience led you to believe.
0 likes • 18d
@Erhard H. I’m not judging you or projecting anything onto you, and I’m not framing you either. If this is how you feel about it, that says a lot. And I don’t see why I would need to “attempt to understand” you in the way you’re expecting it. I’m simply reflecting what I’m seeing and saying it out loud. And yes, this can feel uncomfortable. Some people will use it to reflect, some will just spiral down deeper into self-justification. And I didn’t walk away without saying anything - I three times gave you an answer that you didn’t respect, so I had to react. Simple. So no, I don’t want to continue this conversation.
The Illusion of “Me”
You don’t have a self, you have a habit. What you call “me” is repetition. The same thoughts, the same reactions, the same emotional patterns, over and over again. Repetition creates familiarity. Familiarity creates identity. And suddenly, a pattern feels like a person. You say, “That’s just who I am.” But if it were truly you, it wouldn’t change based on mood, environment, or memory. Most of what you defend is not you. It’s conditioning you’ve practiced long enough to believe. That’s why change feels hard. Not because it is hard, but because you’re trying to change what you’re still identifying with. There is a moment where you begin to see this clearly. Where you notice that thoughts come and go, emotions rise and fall, reactions appear and disappear. But something remains. Something that is aware of all of it. And that changes everything. Because you are no longer inside the pattern. You are the one noticing it. And from there, what felt fixed becomes flexible. What felt like you becomes something you can let go of.
There is no God outside of you that could be found, approached, or worshipped
As long as one assumes that God is something separate, something “out there”, one remains within separation. Prayer, devotion, asking for help or grace all presuppose this division. This statement is a worldview articulated centuries ago by Prakashananda Saraswati, an Indian philosopher and teacher who most likely lived in the 15th or early 16th century. I recently came across his perspective and spent some time engaging with it more deeply. I want to share a short overview here as a possible point of reflection. Prakashananda belonged to the Advaita Vedanta tradition. Unlike devotional or religious movements, this tradition is not concerned with belief systems, rituals, or the worship of a personal God. Its focus lies elsewhere, on the question of what is ultimately real. According to Prakashananda, there is only one reality. This reality is not a being, not a creator figure, not a higher entity standing apart from the world. In Indian philosophy it is often called Brahman, but the name is secondary. It can just as well be described as fundamental being, absolute consciousness, or the underlying principle from which everything arises. What matters is this: it is not separate from us. From this perspective, everything we normally call “the world” has no independent existence of its own. Bodies, thoughts, emotions, objects, nature, time and space all exist and function, but they do not stand on their own. They are appearances, expressions, or objectifications of this one underlying reality. The same applies to the human being. What we usually experience as “I”, personality, biography, thoughts, emotions, belongs to the level of appearance. The true self, according to Prakashananda, is not individual. It is identical with the reality that underlies everything. In classical terms this is expressed as Atman is Brahman. In simple language: what you are at your core is not separate from the foundation of the world. This is where the initial statement becomes clearer. If reality is one and undivided, then the idea of a God outside of oneself becomes problematic. As long as God is imagined as something external, something to be reached, approached, or addressed, separation is already assumed. Prayer, devotion, worship, and the hope for grace may offer emotional comfort or structure, but they operate entirely within this framework of division.
1 like • Jan 19
@Erhard H. There are over 8 billion people in the world, each with their “own worldview”, and most of them are convinced that their “own worldview” is the right one. In the end, I guess we will have to fuck around and find out. If we are lucky, we might figure it out. If not, then the whole game probably starts all over again. That’s the fun part 🙃.
3 likes • Jan 20
@Erhard H. I actually think this is a perfect sentence you quoted. “According to your faith be it unto you.” That is exactly how I live. I choose not to believe that the material world is something evil I need to escape from, because if I truly believed that, my life would inevitably turn into hell. I choose not to believe that I need a fear based salvation model in order to be redeemed, because then fear would become the dominant force shaping my experience. According to my faith, that is precisely how reality responds. I do not live my life within an endless redeemer narrative. My faith is that this life itself is a gift. A space to experience what God has created, to explore it, to learn through it, and to engage with it fully rather than reject it. I believe we are all expressions of God. That God experiences life through us, explores itself through us, and even praises itself through lived experience. For me, honoring God means living my life as fully, consciously, and honestly as I can. In that sense, “according to your faith be it unto you” does not threaten me at all. It reassures me. Because it reminds me that what we believe shapes how we experience life, not that one rigid interpretation stands over all others as a final verdict. If self-determination is something I believe must be surrendered, then naturally my experience will reflect submission and dependency. But if I believe that conscious self-determination is part of how God expresses itself through human life, then that is exactly what unfolds. A life lived out of fear of life itself is no proof of truth. And a spirituality that cannot hold joy, play, or curiosity is too small for what it claims to explain. I’m also careful not to confuse a deeply meaningful personal view with a universal prescription for all of humanity. For me, the moment someone claims to know the purpose, it already turns into a belief system rather than lived truth. And I place my faith in God, trusting in merging with my soul, and so be it unto me.
Honor your body
I had an exchange on Instagram today and felt like sharing my text here. Maybe it resonates with you in some way. For a long time, I only drank when I was out. With people. At parties. Festivals. Concerts. Social gatherings. Being around others without alcohol felt unbearable. Drinking was not a choice. It was the entry ticket. At home, it was different. I did not miss alcohol at all. Not even a single drop. That alone should have told me something. Then one day, I woke up with a sudden, quiet realization. This body is the most extraordinary thing I will ever own. It keeps me alive without asking. It breathes, heals, adapts, carries me through every single day. It is the only reason I can experience anything at all. Without it, there is no seeing, no feeling, no remembering, no living. It is the only way I can perceive this life, to see, to feel, to smell, to move, to touch this world. This body, this one fragile, intelligent vessel, is the only thing that will truly stay with me until my last breath. And I was pouring poison into it. Again and again. Forcing it to fight, to filter, to clean up after me. I remember thinking: What am I actually doing? So I stopped. Not out of discipline. Not out of fear. But out of respect. Because I realized something even deeper: I was not drinking because I loved alcohol. I was drinking to belong. I would not have been with those people without drinking. I would not have been at those parties. That life only worked as long as I numbed myself enough to tolerate it. And that was the moment it became clear: I was living a life that was not really mine. When you are truly yourself, you do not need alcohol. You do not need cigarettes to hold onto. You do not need anything to escape your own body. The urge to drink is rarely about alcohol. It is a signal that your body already knows you do not belong where you are. That you are not living your real truth. And that truth does not have to look impressive. It might be quiet. It might be sitting alone at home, choosing simplicity over noise. But when it is real, you can feel it. And when it is real, you no longer need to numb yourself to survive it.
Where will A.I. bring us?
Society is on the move. AI is being implemented in several facets of our world and used by a large part of society already. It seems very ignorant to implement a tool as strong as AI without thinking about the consequences for the near and far future. The youth of today has lost the capacity to do simple calculations; without a calculator or smart phone they are lost for answers. And now we have chat gpt; fast access to a huge amount of information, but at the same time less and less people using their brains. Everybody has answers, but very few people can think. It is going to be very interesting!!! But maybe that is just another ego opinion, filled with fear and based on the feeling of losing control. In my mind it is very possible that AI will show us that we are already a very advanced form of AI. That we identify with our 3D body, mind and emotions but that we are a kind of bio-AI. The creator (programmer?) has built an ingenious virtual reality game / experience with rules and several levels. It reminds me of the time I was playing Donkey Kong on a machine in the bar where I spent a lot of my childhood… Maybe it was so attractive because it was completely in sync with the basics of the human game. Human being…. Who is doing the human being? Or…. Who is being the human? Or… who is having the human experience? I have no doubt that it will become clear to me(us) during this life. What an amazing time are we experiencing! ❤️ Jan
2 likes • Jan 17
Maybe they are not ignorant at all, maybe it is a carefully calculated act, done with full intent and strategic awareness. I’m firmly convinced, that the question is not what Al will make of humanity, but what humanity will make of Al (this remains true only as long as AI is freely chosen. When it is imposed through force or authority, the issue is no longer technology, but power and intention.) Every consequence flows from intention. And in a world increasingly numbed by distraction, only a small number will remain awake enough to stand above the machine as conscious beings. But history shows that even tools of distraction can turn into catalysts for awakening. Social media was meant to distract, yet countercurrents emerged and led to the opposite effect: more and more people waking up. For this reason, the real task is inner work, so that artificial intelligence can be used not to numb awareness, but to accelerate awakening and enable others to do the same. In the end, we cannot save others before we save ourselves. All we can do is work on ourselves, knowing that others will either recognize it, reflect it, or walk their own path. Just like children, people don’t change because they are told to. They change by observing. We can only live in a way that makes awakening possible. The rest is not in our hands.
1-10 of 52
Ava Mudra
5
257points to level up
@ava-mudra-1023
Who are you, when nobody is watching? No audience? No applause? What remains when everything you’ve learned, imagined, and performed falls away?

Active 18d ago
Joined Nov 3, 2025
Powered by