This framework answers one question every club director secretly has: “Why aren’t our players actually improving?” Bickham Soccer Consulting [email protected] 1-206-612-3338

I don’t believe soccer is taught poorly. I believe it’s taught without sequence. 1v1 → 2v1 → 3v2 isn’t complexity, it’s how understanding actually forms. Curious how many clubs truly teach in layers vs sessions.

Soccer. Basketball. Hockey. Lacrosse. Handball. Rugby. Water Polo, etc… Different tools. Same problems. Every invasion game asks the same questions: - How do we create superiority? - How do we use space? - How do we support the ball? - How do we attack a numerical advantage? - How do we defend collectively when we don’t have it? A 2v1 in soccer is the same decision structure as a 2v1 in basketball.Hockey, Lacrosse etc… Only the surface changes: - Feet instead of hands - Ball instead of puck - Grass instead of court or ice or pool But the decisions do not change. When coaches treat each sport as “unique,” they end up teaching skills in isolation instead of decisions in context. That’s why kids struggle to transfer learning. And why great athletes often excel across multiple sports. Principles first. Skills serve the principles. Once you see it, you can’t unsee it. — Mark

You’ll often hear: “Soccer is a game of infinite decisions.” It sounds progressive. In reality, it leads to chaos coaching. Infinity cannot exist inside a bounded system. Soccer is constrained by: - Field dimensions - Player numbers - Laws of the game - Time - Direction and objective What soccer actually is: a game of repeatable situations. A 2v1 Is a Mathematical Equation A 2v1 is not chaos. It’s a solvable problem. Within that situation, the attacking options are finite. The 5 attacking possibilities in a 2v1 are: 1. Dribble (commit the defender) 2. Wall pass 3. Overlap 4. Take over 5. Through pass Those options do not change. What changes are: - Defender distance - Speed - Angle - Timing - Space available That’s parameter variation, not new decisions. The equation stays the same. Coaches often confuse complexity with infinity. A defender stepping earlier doesn’t create a new option. A tighter space doesn’t invent a new decision. It simply changes which of the five options is appropriate, and when. That’s why players can be taught: - Recognition - Timing - Priority - Manipulation Instead of guessing. Why “Infinite Soccer” Produces Poor Coaching When we believe the game is infinite, we tend to: - “Let them figure it out” - Praise outcomes randomly - Correct inconsistently - Avoid benchmarks - Avoid assessment That’s not development. That’s hope masquerading as philosophy. Structure Liberates Creativity. Creativity doesn’t come from chaos. It comes from clarity under pressure. When players understand: - This is a 2v1 - These are my options - This is the priority They play faster, calmer, and more creatively. The Bottom Line Soccer isn’t infinite. It’s a series of repeatable, solvable situations that appear at speed. If we refuse to teach the structure of those situations, we’re not teaching the game — we’re outsourcing learning to chance. This is the foundation of how we coach here.