I'm live to answer whatever you throw at me. Copy, deliverability, closers, strategy. Nothing's off limits. People pay $2,500/hr for this. You're an Insider, so you get it for free. 📅 Tomorrow 🕐 10am - 11am Eastern 📍 Join here Come with your toughest questions. This is how cold email killers get built. See you in the morning 🤙

Claude Code has a feature almost nobody uses yet: mods. They're small plugins that run inside your session and add things Claude Code never shipped with. I've built eleven. A pane that shows every subagent working, live. Every Claude session on my Mac drawn as planets. A warning before auto-compact hits. A heads-up before my Mac freezes. Claude's last command waiting in my prompt box, one Tab away. The skill I use to build them is attached to this post (SKILL.md). It's yours, free. How to use it: 1. Update Claude Code. Mods need version 2.1.287 or later. 2. Save the file as ~/.claude/skills/claude-code-mods/SKILL.md 3. Restart Claude Code and say "build a mod that..." plus your idea. What's the first mod you'd build? Drop it below.

Nobody gives you real feedback on something they got for free. Somebody on the AMA offered to be a guinea pig for something I'm building, and it got me thinking about the order I actually use. The best guinea pigs are, first, my team. Second, my Insiders. Third, people who are actually paying me. And you don't really get the real feedback until people are paying you money. That's what I learned launching Consulti, our cold email lead gen software. We had our team demo it. Then we had our Insiders demo it. I got pretty solid feedback out of both of those rounds. Then people started paying me for it, and man, it was a whole different level of feedback. My guess at why: a free tester will tell you what's broken, and a paying customer will tell you what's broken in the exact workflow they needed to finish today. Free testers aren't lazy, they're just not under the same pressure. Someone testing as a favor pokes at it with whatever part of their day is already flexible. Someone who paid runs it straight into their actual constraints on day one, and their tolerance for a rough edge is zero. I'm not telling you to skip the friendly rounds. I still run them. My staff is demoing and debugging the next thing I'm building right now, and that round will catch plenty. Just don't read a clean internal test as evidence that you're ready. Read it as evidence that you removed the obvious problems. The painful ones are still out there, waiting for somebody with a credit card. Which group are you testing with right now?

I am so excited to share my passions for AI automation with you. I created this community for actual business owners that want to start implementing AI into their businesses to scale faster, with less staff. This community will NOT be free for long. I will be adding my automations piece-by-piece. These are the SAME automations I use in my Inc 5000 agency that enable us to scale to $700K/mo with few staff. Now some next steps... 1. INTRODUCE YOURSELF in the comments on this post. 2. ASK FOR HELP if you need it by posting in the 'Automation Help' category. Include loom videos. My team and the community will try to help. BEFORE asking for help, search for your issue in the search bar. 3. GIVE VALUE. Help others if they ask. Share your own automation templates and walkthroughs. 4. BLUEPRINTS are available inside the Classroom and separated by use case (Sales, content, etc). You may need to pay to unlock certain modules. 5. WAITING is available for our AI Automation Insider Ultra program. Details coming soon. Welcome to the AI Automation Insiders!

Hi everyone, I've used a little bit of Chat-GPT and Claude, but AI Insiders is a whole different Universe! I feel just a little overwhelmed but I will dig in and start building! How about you? Are there other newbies like me just starting out?😃