Great question, Angela. My first instinct is always to look at whether the image feels authentic and trustworthy before anything else. A technically perfect image can still fail if it doesn't create confidence or connect with the person viewing it. Interestingly, I think communities work the same way. First of all, I want to acknowledge the consistency you've shown in building and showing up for your community. That kind of commitment is rare, and it deserves recognition. From what I've observed, the bigger challenge often isn't getting members it's making sure the right members immediately recognize the value, trust the process, and feel compelled to engage. With 6 members, you'd normally expect to see a higher percentage actively participating if the positioning, onboarding, and member journey are fully aligned. I've seen newer communities generate stronger engagement simply because they optimized those areas early. The value was already there they just made it easier for the right people to see it. Just like experts do a quick gut check on an image, potential members do a quick gut check on a community. They're subconsciously asking: Is this for me? Can this help me? Can I trust the person leading it? Those first impressions often determine whether someone becomes an active member or stays a silent observer. I think your community has strong potential. It may simply need a few optimizations to strengthen those trust signals and create a clearer path from joining to engaging.