Let me explain. 30 or 40 years ago, information had enormous value. If you wanted to learn a language, you needed a teacher. You needed to buy a dictionary or go to the library. If you wanted to open a business, you had to figure things out almost blindly. Information itself was the product. But now? AI can generate almost any information instantly. Ask ChatGPT: “How do I start a restaurant?” You’ll get a full step-by-step plan in seconds. So the real competitive advantage is no longer knowledge. It’s experience. AI can tell you what usually works. But it hasn’t: • survived real mistakes • developed intuition • learned from failure • built judgment That still comes from doing. Which raises an interesting question. In a world where AI gives everyone access to information… Does experience become the most valuable asset? Or will AI eventually replace that too?

Do you agree with this? And most importantly: Are you already acting like that’s true? 🤔 Most professionals hear “AI can automate 80% of your work” and immediately panic. But what if that’s the opportunity? What if that means you finally get to double down on your real 20%? Your judgment. Your taste. Your positioning. Your ability to make decisions and take responsibility. AI can draft. AI can summarize. AI can structure. AI can generate variations. But it cannot assume liability. It cannot truly understand long-term strategy. It cannot feel the weight of a decision. That part is still yours. — For me personally, this has been very real. In content creation alone, AI has saved me an absurd amount of time. It helps me: - Structure lessons faster - Refine explanations - Generate examples - Draft email variations - Clarify ideas Not to create my English courses for me. Not to replace my thinking. But to remove friction. And yet — if I’m being honest — I’m still probably using AI at 30–40% of its potential. Which means I’m leaving leverage on the table. So here’s the challenge: If AI can replace or assist 80% of the operational layer of your work… Are you consciously reinvesting that freed time into your 20%? Or are you just doing the same work slightly faster? Big difference. AI + 80/20 thinking is not about becoming an AI expert. It’s about becoming more of what makes you valuable. Be honest: Are you using AI to go deeper into your craft? Or just to move quicker through your inbox? 👀 Let’s discuss.

Sam Altman said it best: AI won’t replace humans - humans who use AI will replace those who don’t. But most professionals misunderstand this. The goal isn’t to let AI do your job. The goal is to use AI to strengthen the part of your job that can’t be replaced: judgment, decision-making, problem framing, execution. 🎯 Today’s Challenge Answer one of these, as concretely as possible: 1. What part of your work would be hardest for AI to replace if you doubled down on it? (Strategy? Client communication? Taste? Prioritization? Teaching? Leadership?) 2. How could AI help you amplify that strength instead of replacing it? Not “doing it for you” — but making you faster, clearer, or more decisive. 3. What’s one task you still do manually that AI could help you execute better this week? No theory. No hype. Just real leverage. 👇 Drop your answer below. Let’s compare notes.

Quick note — sorry for being a bit quiet lately 😅 I was doing some long travelling… lots of trains, airports, connections, the whole thing. Now I’m finally settled for the next few months, which actually made me realize something interesting. I used AI a lot to plan and execute this whole trip properly — routes, timing, decisions, adjustments — and honestly, it made everything way smoother. What surprised me is how much this also helps professionally: I’m basically practicing the same skills, freeing up mental energy, and staying clearer and more focused for work. Do you experience the same thing with AI? Has it helped you think better, organize your life, or work more efficiently? Curious to hear your thoughts 👇

I’m curious where people draw the line. I’ve seen AI be genuinely useful for: - drafting or reviewing documents - clarifying legal or administrative language - preparing questions before talking to a lawyer - organizing information before a consultation At the same time, this is one of those areas where caution really matters. Legal, tax, and medical contexts are exactly where AI can: - sound confident while being wrong - miss jurisdiction-specific rules - oversimplify edge cases that actually matter In practice, I see AI as a support tool, not a replacement: it helps you think, prepare, and ask better questions — but it rarely replaces professional judgment when the stakes are real. I’m interested to hear your experience: Have you ever used AI as a stand-in for a lawyer, doctor, or other professional? How did it work out — and where did you stop trusting it?