it also redefines costs and long-term strategic decisions. On the one hand, Microsoft and Meta surprised positively with their Q4 2025 results, reigniting interest in technology companies amid the AI ​​race.

Screens are teaching kids to treat reality like an app. There is a warning, when touchscreens become normal, Books, bodies and everyday life feel confusing instead of comforting.

When agencies hit a plateau, the default reaction is predictable: “Let’s get more leads.” More traffic. More outreach. More campaigns. But most AI agencies don’t have a lead shortage. They have a lead handling problem. Here’s what actually breaks as volume increases: • response time slows down • qualification gets rushed • sales talks to the wrong people • good leads wait, bad leads consume attention Revenue doesn’t scale with volume. It scales with decision quality. The hidden cost of chasing volume

Here’s the full list and how community, connection & serving others does every single one!! ☑ AI and big data You don’t just hear about AI. You use it. While most professionals are still “planning to learn ChatGPT,” you’re on your 500th conversation. Daily reps with tools others are still exploring. That gap compounds fast. ☑ Analytical thinking What worked? What didn’t? Why? When you build in public, you get immediate feedback loops. You stop guessing and start measuring. Over time, you develop an instinct for what resonates - backed by data, not hope. ☑ Leadership and social influence You don’t wait for a title to lead. You earn trust by sharing what you know, helping others solve problems, and showing up consistently. Influence isn’t given. It’s built - one post, one insight, one conversation at a time.

Does anyone typically seek feedback or approval from their client on the first message of the sleeping beauty automation? I figure that the message needs to align with the client's business but could also be complemented with the client's feedback as well. Is this a common practice, or do most of you only seek feedback