Skin Marrow is submitted to the App Store. Waiting on Apple now, 48 hours to weeks. Honest version: it did not one-shot. I thought 2 days, it took 6. 350+ threads back and forth between me, Claude and Codex. I turned the recording off a couple times because I was just stuck on bugs and didn't want to bore you 😂 But I never wrote a single line of code. Not one. What surprised me most: the code was never the hard part. Ideation was. A lot of ideas that felt great died the second I ran a real market check on them. Full build, start to finish, nothing cut 👇 https://youtu.be/basupz-qRmQhttps://youtu.be/basupz-qRmQ Total cost to put an app on the App Store: $99/yr for the Apple developer program. That's it. No course, no tool stack, no agency. And you guys get TestFlight before YouTube does — I'll drop the link here the moment Apple approves 🔥 One line: what's the app you keep almost building? Tell me and I'll tell you which part Claude will actually fight you on. After 304 threads I've got a decent read on where it breaks 💪 p.s. tiny favor as always — a like or a comment on the video really helps with the anti-crickets protocol 😂 p.p.s. if you missed part 1 where we designed the whole thing in Claude Design, it's linked in the description.

Everyone can build an app with AI now. But can you still turn one into a profitable business? I’m testing that question from scratch—starting at $0 and documenting everything: - Market and competitor research - Choosing and validating the idea - Building the app with Claude Code - Launching the first version - Marketing it and finding users - Sharing the real results Part 1 is live now. It covers the research, decisions, build, and launch. Go show some love in Youtube, Movers! *Your Likes and comments means ALOT! 💪 https://youtu.be/q7h22yTSxFg?si=OcVh-I66_N0bHGAV

It seems that a lot of fake hype and vibecoded garbages are slowing down..(hopefully) What make you excited these days? Curious to know what everyone's tinkering and experimenting

I made Claude + Codex argue over my work—then give me one answer Most people use AI one tab at a time. Claude knows one conversation. Codex knows another. Then *you* become the project manager carrying context, comparing answers, and deciding what survives. I just published a walkthrough of a different setup using Buzz—the open-source workspace built by Block where humans and AI agents can work in the same channels. In the video, I: - give the same job to separate Claude and Codex agents - make them work independently instead of copying each other - have them challenge the weak parts of each other's work - make them converge on one final output while I keep the final decision - show how to create your first channel and agent from scratch The real unlock isn't “another AI assistant.” It's coordination: shared context, visible handoffs, different models with different jobs, and one human still owning the outcome. Watch it here: https://youtu.be/N7bZlTq0h5g After you watch, tell me this: **what is the first repeated job you would hand an AI teammate?** (in the youtube video) Don't give me an agent name—give me the job. I'll turn the best answers into copy-paste agent instructions for the next video. 🐝

So this pretty cool! It is basically a slack clone that you connect all your different agents to and you can talk with them and @tag them. https://github.com/block/buzz