Following up on the XAUUSD sell idea I posted earlier this morning . took an L on the first attempt. But I'm seeing clear bearish pressure building up again, so I've reentered from the current 1H supply zone. Silver is still looking bearish as well. Let's see how this one plays out. 👀

Liquidity Logic has only been live for two weeks, and in those two weeks we’ve produced 3R in week one and 5.8R in week two. That’s 8.8R in just 10 trading days. To put that into perspective, on a single 50k futures funded account, that would’ve been roughly $1,300. On a 400k max allocation, depending on your risk model, that could’ve been anywhere between $17,000 and $35,000. Imagine where you could be in 6 months if this is what’s possible after only 2 weeks. This is what real trading looks like. No fake signal group. No TP1, TP2, TP3 and TP4 slowly eating away at your profits. No forcing trades every single day just to keep people entertained. Just patience, context, discipline and execution. But here’s the part I really want you to understand: none of this is possible if you’re simply spectating. I’ve seen it happen too many times. People join communities, sit quietly in the background, consume content passively and wonder months later why nothing has changed. Meanwhile, the traders who engage, ask questions, reflect, review their mistakes and fully immerse themselves in the process are slowly transforming into completely different traders. That’s exactly what this community is built for. Don’t underestimate how quickly things can change if you genuinely commit to the process. Two weeks may not sound like a long time, but that’s already two weeks of opportunities, discussions, trade breakdowns and lessons that some people have taken advantage of while others have simply watched from the sidelines. The market isn’t waiting, and neither is everybody else. Don’t join Liquidity Logic to be a spectator. Join it to become the trader you’ve always wanted to be. Information doesn’t change traders. Immersion does.

Levels I'm most interested in today. I am not interested in trading in the middle of the blue box. That's where most of the trading occurred as you can clearly see displayed by the volume profile. We trade from the edges, not from the middle of the noise. Once price hits PDH or London low, we assess what it is likely to do next. There's low volume nodes on both sides, so we could be seeing some clean price delivery if price manages to break out of this consolidation. I do, however, favour longs into the weekly high, like I've mentioned multiple times this week. This is the last trading day of the week as tomorrow is a bank holiday.

I didn’t want to send the third entry here without first having the time to write a full explanation for you all. As mentioned yesterday, the most likely scenario was a tap into the NWOG followed by a reversal. You saw me enter twice already, and both trades ended at break-even. For many traders, this is where they close the charts, become frustrated, and reassess the following day. In many cases, that’s actually the sensible thing to do. However, trading is not an exact science, and sometimes it takes more than a simple tap into a POI to trigger the move you’re anticipating. In this particular case, I still believed the probabilities heavily favoured a reversal. If price needed a deeper retracement into the NWOG before moving, I was willing to allow that to happen. These are the moments where I don’t need every single confluence to align. I don’t need every FVG to invert, every OB to be respected, or CVD to print a perfect divergence. When you have a clear narrative and the odds are stacked in your favour, it’s worth putting risk on the table without waiting for the perfect entry. This is what I want you all to understand, and why I believe discretionary trading will always outperform mechanical trading in the long run. Please don’t use this as an excuse to overtrade. That’s not what’s happening here. There’s a big difference between forcing trades and re-executing an idea that still has a valid thesis behind it. This is about understanding the market conditions you’re in, keeping the bigger picture in mind, and recognising when the market is still supporting your original idea. A tap into the NWOG with a very clear scenario developing doesn’t happen every week. These are opportunities we don’t want to be afraid of. One psychological lesson I’ve learned over the years is that break-even trades should not emotionally reset your analysis. Too many traders subconsciously treat a break-even as a loss and abandon a perfectly valid idea because they feel frustrated. The market doesn’t know, and certainly doesn’t care, that you’ve already entered twice.

Today, I would be a bit more risk-off as we have FOMC later, and the direction of the week is likely to be influenced by its outcome. Key levels I’d be looking at are London high and PDL (mindful that the NWOG is right below). Ideal scenario post FOMC would be a tap into NWOG > assessment > bullish footprints > entry model > targeting high on the week