9d • General discussion
Researchers, you're using AI wrong (unintentionally).
You paste in your drafts and ask it to "make it better."
That's not using AI. That's outsourcing your thinking (and slowly handing your job to a machine.)
Here's how I think about it differently:
AI is my writing advisor and sounding board I can talk to 24/7.
Not my ghostwriter.
When I use AI in my writing, I'm not asking it to replace what I do. I'm using it to:
→ challenge my arguments before a reviewer does
→ pressure-test my logic when I'm too close to the work
→ help me see my own weaknesses faster
The goal is to come out of that process with better quality output, not to produce something I couldn't have written myself.
Here's the uncomfortable truth:
If AI can fully replicate your academic voice, your reasoning, your expertise... what exactly are you bringing to the table?
Your unique value isn't your ability to write sentences.
It's the decades of domain knowledge, the hard-won intuition, the ability to ask questions no one else is asking.
AI should amplify that. Not replace it.
Now, as a lifelong learner, I'm curious how you are using AI in your academic writing or research workflow?
6
4 comments
Researchers, you're using AI wrong (unintentionally).
powered by
skool.com/research-career-club-8446
Become 'go-to' research expert by delivering novel research; engaging outside academia; and building profile to amplify impact | Created by Prof Hanak
Suggested communities
Powered by