Short answer: not much — at least not on their own.
Today’s quantum computers are:
- noisy
- small
- expensive to run
- and not ready to replace classical systems
If someone tells you otherwise, they’re overselling.
So why are researchers and companies still interested?
Because quantum computers:
- let us experiment with new ways of modeling problems
- can act as specialized components inside larger classical workflows
- help us understand where future advantages might emerge
In practice, almost all meaningful work today is:
- hybrid (classical + quantum)
- exploratory
- and problem-specific
This is why the right starting question is never:
“How do I use a quantum computer?”
It’s:
“What problem am I trying to solve, and why do classical tools struggle here?”
In this community, we’ll be very clear about this:
quantum computing today is about learning, structure, and preparation — not immediate performance wins.
If you’re here for honest discussions, you’re exactly where you should be.
Question:
What have you heard about quantum computers that you’re most skeptical about?