๐†๐จ๐จ๐ ๐ฅ๐ž ๐†๐ž๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ข ๐Ÿ’ ๐€๐ซ๐ ๐จ๐ง ๐ฆ๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐›๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐›๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ ๐€๐ˆ ๐ฆ๐จ๐๐ž๐ฅ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐œ๐ฒ๐›๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ž๐œ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐๐ž๐Ÿ๐ž๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ฒ๐ž๐ญ
I'm excited for this one. Gemini models were always one of the best, if ...not the best for cybersecurity defenders. I don't need my model to create game in unreal engine (although it's very cool). So why Argon?
๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Google says Argon can autonomously find, validate and patch critical software vulnerabilities.
It also scored 77.9% on DeepSWE v1.1 and supports long-context work up to 1M tokens. That is a very serious combination for security engineering and triage.
If you look current Thor Benchmarks for Cyber Defender Gemini 3.7 Flash ranked first there with:
โ€ข 72.5% Quality Score
โ€ข 72.5% Balanced OTS
โ€ข 0.0% Critical Miss
โ€ข 28.9% False Review
โ€ข 100% Threat Capture
For Blue Teams, ๐‚๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐œ๐š๐ฅ ๐Œ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ is the metric I care about most here.
Why? Because it measures real incidents that were incorrectly suppressed as false positives. A 0% result means no true-positive findings in this benchmark were suppressed as false positives.
That does not prove one universal winner. THOR explicitly says there is no single best model. Review load, cost, latency and deployment constraints still matter.
But I will keep an eye on Argon as this might be another leap with AI for cyber defense.
1
0 comments
Pavel Hrabec
4
๐†๐จ๐จ๐ ๐ฅ๐ž ๐†๐ž๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ข ๐Ÿ’ ๐€๐ซ๐ ๐จ๐ง ๐ฆ๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐›๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐›๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ ๐€๐ˆ ๐ฆ๐จ๐๐ž๐ฅ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐œ๐ฒ๐›๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ž๐œ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐๐ž๐Ÿ๐ž๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ฒ๐ž๐ญ
AI Cybersecurity Academy
skool.com/ai-cybersecurity-academy
Break into Cybersecurity with AI. Then use your skills to grow from beginner to expert in AI cybersecurity with 6 figure salary.๐Ÿ’ฐ
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by