Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Fix-The-Mix™

26.4k members • Free

The 10k Club

9.4k members • Free

Intro to Music Production

2.9k members • Free

The Composer's Brain (Free)

4k members • Free

1287 contributions to Fix-The-Mix™
Tightening up my 808/sub game
Hey, guys. I'm always trying to level up my mixes. I've been paying attention to the way the music I jam has 808s and subs that sound spread out even though I know that low end instruments are supposed to be in mono; so I did a Google search on whether or not they should be in mono or spread out. Paraphrasing, it basically said do a little of both. This is how it said to do it: Methods for spreading high frequencies: • Mid/Side EQ: Use a Mid/Side EQ to apply a high-pass filter to the "Side" channel. This removes the low frequencies from the stereo field, effectively making your sub-bass mono while leaving the upper harmonics in stereo. • Stereo Imager: A dedicated stereo imaging plugin can expand the higher frequencies without affecting the low frequencies. Some plugins even have a "bass mono" feature to make this process easier. • Distortion and Saturation: Applying distortion or saturation to your 808 adds higher harmonic content. You can then use a mid/side EQ or imager to spread only these new harmonics. Both of my parametric EQs have midside processing as well as my mastering EQ and I believe a few of my other plugins do, too. For the parametric EQs, when I select the midside parameter, and I'm able to toggle between the two sides, are both changes being processed in each side even though I can only view one channel at a time? (Keep in mind I'm a fetus at midside processing.) And how does the mid channel get processed? Also, it says the upper frequencies should be widened. What are the "upper frequencies and upper harmonics" of an 808 or a sub? Would that be the frequencies that bleed into the low mids? I'm an amateur. My foundation is Dylan's YT tutorials, which I follow pretty much to the letter. Some of you are familiar with "The Chef Method" that works so well. Of course, there's also the reverb and compressor tutorials. After compounding all those different strategies (including the analog plugin chain) and then doing a little of my own creative work (transient shapers, tilt EQs, tremolo, etc.), I do a crap load of processing, so after every phase up until delay, I bounce each aux so I don't run out of inserts and don't run into the problems that come from overprocessing. At what point during The Chef Method (1. Cleanup, 2. Enhance/balance, 3. Mix bus EQ, 4. Blend, 5. Tweak/touch up) do I do the midside processing, widening, and saturation of the 808s and subs?
1 like • 5h
@Rick Sanders RE: What are the "upper frequencies and upper harmonics" of an 808 or a sub? Not to be a pest but…depends. Recommend taking a few samples and playing with them, analyzing them by themselves. Scoop out certain frequencies…How does it sound? “Better,” “worse”? Then: Try that same scoop-out in the context of a song. How does it sound? Mmmmm… OK. My little tip for SOME of these 808s is vary the tempo, vary the pitch. Some of these SOUND higher or lower than they actually are…sometimes varying tempo and pitch can work wonders over other choices you might be inclined to make, especially if the quality of the beat or sample is lacking.
DO YOU LISTEN TO COMPOSERS?
We of course recognize and most often think about songs. It’s all about vocal production, songwriting and lyrics in SONGS. But of course there’s a whole world of MUSIC WITHOUT WORDS… Are you listening? From Mozart to Moby, from jazz to classical …everything else that’s not that, who and what do you listen to that is mainly instrumental? What COMPOSERS do you pay attention to in order to learn, to compose/write better or different instrumentation for yourself, to reach out to for advice, etc.? How has that person or those people helped your work, how did you learn and grow? It doesn’t have to be anyone famous or well known! Please share those gems we may not know about!
DO YOU LISTEN TO COMPOSERS?
3 likes • Jul 13
@Earle Brown 🤩
2 likes • 3d
@Jaxon Reed Back atcha…thanks for keeping this zombie post alive! It needs something real though…
Roots music feedback
Hi, I have a client who's talking to sync supervisors about a few of his tunes. They love some but had some comments about a few of the tracks. Now off the top, I know he's not the best singer in the room. Anyways - I would love to get some feedback a couple of the tunes I mixed for him. https://open.spotify.com/track/4AluIOMeLaYMHhI69ZAz6I?si=b9b66f0ab9be4b90 https://open.spotify.com/track/3liqSYb0XVvKfUVQ5jKTbq?si=277a19ac2c6d4a24
3 likes • 9d
I want to mention for everybody—It’s great to have reached out to music supervisors…there’s also a TON of platforms out there for sync, not all of them charge and some of them will provide feedback, as well.
LET’S DISCUSS THE NEW SPOTIFY TERMS
Are you aware of the new Spotify terms as of a few weeks ago, the end of August? If not: LET’S DISCUSS! If so, what do you think? LET’S DISCUSS! Either way, there’s not a lot of discussions out there on this (yet) …changes sort of happened quietly but in keeping with many trends discussed here and elsewhere. A Google search or a peek at the new terms is sure to be interesting…so, have a look and…LET’S DISCUSS!
LET’S DISCUSS THE NEW SPOTIFY TERMS
1 like • 9d
@Andy Laird RE: We all should be able to opt in for things instead of opting out. There’s lawyers out there on YouTube and Instagram alerting people, going through the new terms and fully explaining what the new terms mean to people. They’re literally saying…this is what I would do or say with a client on terms like these. This is not fine print it’s … THE print, it’s upfront where you can’t miss it. The thing is..this is new territory. I’m not all that sure the language is easy to understand. No…they’re not going to tell you in plain terms that you agree that they now own your work as a condition of using the platform. But…the lawyers out there explaining terms like “worldwide irrevocable licenses”…yeah, that’s what that means…you grant Spotify full ownership without recourse or compensation now. So basically? You are opting in to opting out on yourself.
1 like • 9d
@Andy Laird I want to add that I have seen and experienced situations LIKE the one now in place on Spotify, but never EXACTLY THIS. You know, to my knowledge… I am less familiar with music industry or even social media terms. But I have seen something similar on educational platforms. On the educational platforms I’ve been on or communities that I’ve joined, it’s implicit that you’re signing away your rights to your content in exchange for the value of the free education offered. The value of what YOU offer that they can extract from?? Possibly indeterminate…you’d have to guess how much you could make instead of allowing it to be on there for free for them to decide. I’ve had work I offered for free in exchange for free education repackaged and sold to scale. Stuff like that is always kind of surprising…at first…but NOW you have to factor in that AI may be playing a role in that. The AI is identifying and extracting value from human endeavor. So…the models Spotify is using have been out there just not on this scale and not in this context previously. It really makes me wonder if the terms themselves were not in some way AI generated…meaning…thereby…AI is protecting itself, extracting value for itself and…creating itself, simultaneously.
BEEN A WHILE
Hows everyone doing ! what yall be up to
4 likes • 14d
Err’thang. Nuffin.
1-10 of 1,287
J Es
7
1,090points to level up
@j-es-1573
Hallo! Neither a beginner beginner nor an intermediate intermediate!

Active 5h ago
Joined Aug 22, 2023
Powered by