@Deleted won. Congrats! Well done both! Even though there are invalidated sessions and some abuse patterns, both put in some great effort at the end of the day. Attached is a table with the results breakdown and the invalidation reasons. During the first half of the day both had the same multi session simultaneous answering abuse pattern, but it normalized in the afternoon. Any attempt to try something similar in the next rounds, whether it is with multi-session or any other "strategy", will lead to disqualification. We are filtering the results here because the warning was issued yesterday when they were already in the middle of their duel. Invalidation reasons: @Shubho Mehedi - 11 sessions / 371 answers excluded for simultaneous multi-session answering. - 6 sessions / 246 answers excluded for non-section-level activity. - 5 sessions / 176 answers excluded for sub-75% accuracy. - 1 session / 31 answers excluded for avg time <25s (17.3s avg). @Deleted - 6 sessions / 273 answers excluded for simultaneous multi-session answering. - 0 exclusions for non-section-level activity. - 0 exclusions for sub-75% accuracy. - 0 exclusions for sub-25s answering.