I’ve been looking at our leaderboard lately, and something honestly bothers me. There are accounts that appear to be highly automated or behaving like bots, gaining massive amounts of points in a very short period of time. And the question I keep coming back to is: Why are they still allowed to compete on the leaderboard? If someone is genuinely participating, learning, supporting others, and contributing to the community — great. That’s exactly what a leaderboard should reward. But if someone is using automation, repetitive copy-paste comments, or other tactics simply to generate points, then what are we actually measuring? Engagement? Contribution? Or who can game the system most efficiently? And this isn't just about one person or one position on the leaderboard. It affects everyone who is participating honestly. Someone spending months consistently contributing can suddenly be overtaken by an account generating huge numbers of interactions in a few days. That can be incredibly frustrating. I’m not saying every highly active account is a bot. High activity alone isn't proof of anything. But when the patterns are obvious enough to raise questions, shouldn't they at least be reviewed? If #BelieveNation is about believing in yourself, supporting others, and building meaningful connections, then the quality of contribution should matter more than the quantity of points. So I want to ask the community: Should leaderboard activity be reviewed when an account shows suspiciously high activity or repetitive behavior? And more importantly: Are we comfortable continuing to reward behavior that may be gaming the system? I’d genuinely like to hear what everyone thinks. 💭