There are 2 dispositive motions in play awaiting the District Judge's ruling. Tracy's rule 56 (served first) partial summary judgement on official liability only and Defense's 12(c) judgement on the pleadings. I am considering doing a full breakdown of the case filings and offer my opinion. Let us know what you think. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69650770/arnold-v-city-of-guntown/

https://www.givesendgo.com/CivilRight101 Hello Members, Tracy here, It is not my intent to request money but I need your help supporting my efforts to hold state actors accountable in Federal Court! Any contributions at all are appreciated! This case involves events from 2017-2023 where a city issued arrest warrants and collection notices during a pending appeal. The county court (state court) found in June 2023 that "the delay in this matter violated the Defendant's Constitutional right to Due Process" and that "this should not have happened as this matter is on appeal and has been for over 5 years. Key Facts: - (State) County court ordered amendments to charges in April 2018, but the court found the city "decided against filing the Amended Affidavits" for over 5 years - In April 2023, I filed a motion documenting the arrest warrants and collections during appeal, plus the court orders to amend complaints - Instead of amending complaints, stopping collections, stopping arrest warrants, or responding to pleadings, the city filed a motion seeking 18 months imprisonment and immediate trial - County court then ruled my rights were violated and ordered arrest warrants "should be stricken immediately" - Defense did not appeal, motion to reconsider, or respond to the state court findings of constitutional violation. - Independent auditors issued identical warnings for 9 consecutive years (2015-2023) about "a single employee in charge of fine collections, docket entry, and warrant issuances" and "risking public funds" Current Federal Case Status: I have filed a 42 USC 1983 Federal Civil Rights Case for several constitutional violations that were found by the State Court & includes additional information I have found on my own. https://www.courtlistener.com/.../arnold-v-city-of-guntown/ Defendants filed their answer without filing a 12(b)(6) motion or any pre answer motion! This means I am in a very good position.

Ever wondered how to win a legal battle without stepping foot in a courtroom? Dive into the game-changing power of summary judgment with tips straight from Celotex Corp. v. Catrett. This faceless video breaks down how plaintiffs can snag a victory when the defense can’t fight back. No fluff—just sharp, witty insights to turn your evidence into a knockout punch. Watch now and master the art of winning with Rule 56(c).

“The [individual/citizen] may stand upon his rights as a [creation of the almighty]. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the State or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to criminate him. He owes no such duty to the State, since he ***receives nothing*** therefrom His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law..." Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906)