Does anyone have the tea on where to obtain mailboxes for $3-5 per month? 🤔 I’m specifically looking for the agency names that resell mailboxes and/or the names of the Indian resellers who can create the accounts. 😊

Has anyone built any workflows for enriching data instead of paying for Clay?

I'm very new to all of this and haven't made time to go through the training yet. But, quick question: Is there a tool out there (or that can be made) that can scrape Data Axle? I've tried Apollo, but it doesn't really work well for what I'm trying to do. Thanks!

This weekend I started using Garry Tan's Claude skill called Gstack. It adds several skills to Claude Code that helps with the design and build process. Right now the one I'm using the most is /plan-ceo-review and /plan-eng-review The CEO Review takes a feature or change request and looks at it from multiple angles asking "Is this really what we need or do we need to expand/contract the scope to hit what the user ACTUALLY is looking for?" And it's doing a fantastic job of helping me hash out all the extra questions I forget to ask. The ENG Review takes the same approach but it looks at the gaps in the technology that are going to come up during the build and it gets resolutions for them before the build starts. Then it compiles a comprehensive plan for the agent to build out. If you have time and you aren't using it yet, give it a try. It's significantly helped with my app quality!! If you decide to try it, let me know how it goes! Here’s the link to the GitHub repository: https://github.com/garrytan/gstack

So, I posted a response to Jay’s comment that was removed by moderators, flagged as “be positive”. (Jay’s post: https://www.skool.com/ai-automation-insiders/openclaw-module-coming-very-soon). My comment raised substantive concerns about OpenClaw’s security posture, whether average users would know how to harden systems to use it safely, and whether premium-gating that capability aligns with the broader mission of the Skool community. Nothing in my comment targeted any individual, was abusive, or was intended as a personal attack, and it even used a smiley faced emoji. My commentary was informed by my background ans an cyber security practitioner and was presented as constructive criticism, not negativity. So, my genuine question is this; are members allowed to raise respectful but critical views about products and business decisions here, or is the expectation that commentary should only be supportive? If the former, then “be positive” is too vague to be useful moderation guidance. If the latter, that should probably be stated clearly, because those are very different community standards. More broadly, a healthy community should be able to accommodate more than praise. There is already plenty of discussion about how awesome things are, but, the reality is that substance often sits behind a paywall. For context, the moderated comment was along the lines of questioning OpenClaw’s security, the burden on average users to harden it, and whether making it premium-only was consistent with Jay’s/the community’s mission.