None of this existed in my OS, only the governance layer systems and procedures. On my drive to the gym, I remote-accessed my Mac with Codex and spun up a complete source-backed workout and nutrition planner. Then dropped in one PDF workout plan. Took 3 prompts with less than 2 sentences each. What will you build next? Round 2 is the UI/UX

👋For the last 2 months, I've been heads-down exploring ai image & video generation as my new personal project. I was shock by the capabilities of current ai image/video space. But every ai creators face a common pain point.. this sh*t is hard. Haha. Thats why all youre seeing are ai slops. Then about 1 month ago, I sent the kids to my relative for few weeks and lock myself in a room and went nerd out to build a tool that lets me take an idea and turn it into a profession cinematic video. I recorded it working on a real project and wanted to share what it actually does — and why I'm pouring everything into it. The idea in a nutshell: Instead of guessing what makes a video great, my tool studies one: → I give it an original video as a study case (here's the one I used: [youtube]) → It analyzes that video and pulls out its DNA — the small details in every component that make it work: the shots, the pacing, the sound, the transitions, the feel. → Then it reverse-engineers that DNA into something completely new and my own — and carries it all the way through, even into the editing, mostly automatically. The Unfolded short film bellow received the same DNA treatment, as you will see, the context is similar ..however, it produced a very unique animation perspective using origami. Every user who analyzes a film makes the library richer for the next one. That's a network effect — the rare thing that actually compounds. GitHub for film DNA: fork a look, make it yours, push it back. I have tried to use it to branch off ideas from Game of Thrones series. It is very complex to keep track of all the different kingdoms, characters, props, and story development. But i think i got it figured out. Theres no one size fit all approach for different type of contents. Horror dna cant get mix up with cartoon 😂. But this is the closest thing to a “reusable” end to end video generation. Correct me if im wrong but there isnt a product out there that can solve this yet. This is a foundation to a full content creation pipeline - you re using a proven video as a reference for your own video. Once you figured out your winning format, automate it to create video daily/weekly is the easy part.

I see the explanation in the course as just using context file and lot of competition asks for the below The folder system that solves it. Same structure as every week: - 📄 identity.md - 📐 rules.md Is it just the naming convention or something else

I have nibbled at the edge of this idea and it fits in with ICM well. I am working on tools for it but I think the concept can help others. Quick test: define "AP", "POF", and "Gate". If you said Accounts Payable, Proof of Funds, and a logic gate — reasonable, and wrong. I work in parking. Here those mean Anti-Passback (stops a ticket getting passed back to a second car), Pay-on-Foot (the payment kiosk), and the barrier arm at a lane. Every industry has these. A new hire learns them in their first month. An LLM never does. It just picks the wrong meaning with full confidence and keeps moving. So instead of trying to make the model smarter, make documents smarter. A human maintains a glossary file. Term, what it means, a "not this" line (AP is NOT Accounts Payable), aliases people actually type, and a link to the deeper doc. An agent reads an incoming document (support ticket, email, whatever), finds which glossary terms actually appear in it, and prepends a header defining just those terms. Expand it to include routing tags. Dispatch, Billing, etc. Now every incoming support ticket has the information for the next agent to use. The glossary has who it goes to, or a link to the known troubleshooting process to write up an automated response. This can be done with a lighter model. This document is the router. The document contains the information to understand the document. It is also self-auditable. If no header, something is broken. If it's missing a routing tag because the agent failed to classify, it goes to a place for a human to look at it. Then the human can refine the glossary. I am calling it "Gloss". Would love to hear your thoughts, ideas, and questions.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DaYoXM5v8Xt/?igsh=ZHExa3NvOWx2MTJi