Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Monika

AI Native Company
129
5.0 (2)
$5/month

Turn your solo business into a 1 person AI-Native company that runs like a Fortune 500 without the teams, the big budgets or the overheads

AI Business Builders
102
5.0 (1)
$49/month

Best place to learn & build agentic systems & agents as a no-coder. Access to pre-built agents & pro skills ➡️ Select annual & save 50%

AI Video Bootcamp
29.2k
5.0
$9/m
40 contributions to AI-Driven Business Community
Did you build custom GPTs into your offers?
I built my whole program with 16 GPT assistants and I already started to get nervous August last year, when they suddenly dropped model 40 and replaced it with 5, an unruly, will-just-do-my-own-thing-and-cut-corners model that totally didn't work for my program... 😅😐 luckily they brought it back after the outcry but ever since I was on the lookout for a solution. I found it in Claude skills in January this year and managed to bring it all across just in time before my GPTs became totally useless. But I didn't find the move to skills that straightforward, Claude is very different again, better in some things worse in others. I couldn't just copy things across. But in the end I'm super happy with the skills set up, it can handle complex workflows really well and is super obedient, which is great for my process. It was shocking for me how the rug could just be pulled from under you in the AI world. It was maybe naive of me to think it would be different but I didn't expect functionality to just dissappear, I thought things would just get better, not worse or less advanced. But Open AI and custom GPTs gave me the space and technology to develop my thinking and process so it's all good in the end. With skills you are more the owner of your work and less just renting the space. What has your experience been? Where did you move your GPTs and how was that process?
4 likes • 27d
All these products will eventually sunset because you can build better solutions with code - whether it's any of Codex models or Claude models or something else. This is the only way you will not get the disruptions and will always keep your solutions intact. Otherwise you are always reliant on something.
4 likes • 27d
@Helena Borsje yes the more portable your solutions are the more independent you are. And yes we will always depend on API keys but that’s easily swappable if your underlying solution is platform agnostic.
If you're a coach, Claude Code just made your life so much easier
How to stop re-briefing Claude Code. Anthropic launched this only about a day ago. The problem this actually solves You know the forty minute briefing? You explain your offer. You upload your brand voice. You go back and forth on positioning until Claude finally gets it. And then you hit a fork in the road. You want two versions of the landing page. Or you want to keep working on the copy while something else builds the email sequence. Your old options were both bad. Start fresh and explain everything again. Or ask for both in the same chat and watch it get cluttered and slow. That is what these two commands fix: You type /fork and Claude Code makes a complete copy of your conversation. That copy becomes its own separate Claude, running in the background. Your original chat carries on exactly as it was. The copy remembers everything. Every message. Every file. Every decision you made together. It also keeps your settings, so you do not have to set anything up again.
2 likes • Aug 20
@Wendy Breakstone yes definitely try it
1 like • Aug 21
@Jen Goins it's pretty good
What a LinkedIn Shitstorm Taught Me About AI Agents
Hi everyone! I want to share a recent experience with AI. Although at this point, “odyssey” might be a more accurate word. A while ago, I attended a webinar by Czech AI enthusiast Petr Ludwig about building your own AI team on a virtual server: connecting different models, talking to your agents through Telegram, assigning tasks from your phone, and creating a Human-Agent Wiki where both humans and agents can store knowledge and retrieve it later. 📖 You may know Petr Ludwig as the author of The End of Procrastination. He’s Czech, but the book has been translated into more than 20 languages. He’s also a somewhat controversial figure in the Czech online space. I knew that. What I didn’t realize was how relevant that little detail would become when I decided to share my progress on LinkedIn. So I built myself an AI team Following the webinar, I set up a system with four agents. ⚙️ One acts as the CEO/orchestrator of the team, while the other three specialize in different types of tasks. Under the hood, I’m experimenting with different combinations: - one specialist uses Hermes + ChatGPT - another uses OpenClaw + a lower-tier ChatGPT model - the third uses Hermes + Gemini and is my expensive specialist — I only send it in when I need deeper research rather than everyday tasks And it works. That was basically the point of my LinkedIn post: Hey, I actually built this thing and got it running. I also shared a couple of things I had discovered along the way. ☝️ First, the cheapest ChatGPT Go subscription Ludwig suggested in the webinar wasn’t enough for my setup. I burned through its limits in less than four hours while I was still configuring everything. ✌️ Second, the OpenClaw command-line installer had changed since the webinar was recorded. Somehow, after a fair amount of wrestling with it, I managed to get the original setup running anyway. And let me tell you: troubleshooting becomes significantly more entertaining once you can already complain about the troubleshooting to the CEO of your AI team via Telegram.
What a LinkedIn Shitstorm Taught Me About AI Agents
1 like • Aug 18
The buggest problem with using other people's systems or agents is because they change and your thing stops working. I'm a big fan of building your own with your own code (Claude Code can build absolutely everything - don't forget that both Hermis and OpenClaw were built with Claude Code). Everything I build and use is my own and I dictate how it behaves, when it changes and how and basically I'm not at the mercy of someone else. And I learned this a few years back from trial and error and hitting these exact problems.
Are you leveraging AI or outsourcing your authority?
I spoke with 10 experts this week in different fields and the same concerns kept coming up... ⁉️ "If AI can generate a 10-page strategy document, a month of content, or a course outline in 30 seconds... what happens to the value of my intellectual property?" ⁉️ "How do I charge premium prices when clients think a machine can do half of what I do?" ⁉️ "How do I explain that the magic isn't the raw information, but it's my strategy, my intuition, and the best practices I've learned from trial and error?" If any of this is echoing your inner thoughts, don't worry, you're not alone in there. The problem isn’t using AI for content, prompts, or automation. Those things can absolutely create leverage. The problem is thinking a pile of tools, prompts, and automations is an AI strategy. AI becomes a real business advantage when it is connected to the outcome you are trying to create, the workflow it is meant to improve, the context it needs to work well, and the human judgment required to make sure it actually strengthens the client experience. What will differentiate you in this next phase of the AI era is not how much content you can generate. It is your flair, your relatability, your signature method, your judgment, your stories, and the perspective you have earned through lived experience. That is your advantage. If you've felt hesitant to fully hand your business over to "agents," that’s not fear; I call that your discernment saving you from using AI in ways that make your expertise look generic, replaceable, or disconnected from the transformation you actually deliver. 💬 Quick Question for the Community: How are you protecting your "secret sauce" as you leverage AI in your business? Finish this sentence: “AI can help me with ____________ , but my clients still hire me for _____________.”
Are you leveraging AI or outsourcing your authority?
2 likes • Aug 17
My personal opinion, specifically for providers who offer things that AI can do faster and possibly better than them, is to change their offers from, for example, offering to create the content to building the content infrastructure for those businesses and then maintaining them.
1 like • Aug 18
@Kina Brown that's true, being resilient is seeing the impact and pivoting fast and hard so you can grab a bigger slice of the pie and not loose customers
Let's Play ➡️ WHO ARE YOU?
The official community roll call is LIVE! 👉 What to Do Introduce yourself in the comments and share: - Who you are - What you do for a living — not a full pitch, just context - What you personally love, value, or geek out on - What lights you up about being here Important: ❌ No links in this post, please. ✔️ We want to get to know you — the human behind the work. 👉 Then Take a Minute to Connect After you introduce yourself: - Scroll through the comments - See who’s here - Reply directly to at least THREE people - Share encouragement, resonance, or something you noticed in their intro Let’s meet you. Re-introduce yourself or share for the first time. We’re excited to know who’s here. 💛
Let's Play ➡️ WHO ARE YOU?
9 likes • Jul 21
Hey everyone, I'm Monika and I help (and teach how to) solo entrepreneurs turn their solo business into a 1 person AI-Native company that runs like a Fortune 500 without the teams, the big budgets or the overheads. I love hanging out with my dog in nature, traveling and geeking out on bio-tech, genetics, synthetic biology and futurism. It's a cool group to meet exciting people.
0 likes • Aug 18
@Stevii Mills thank you and looking forward as well
1-10 of 40
Monika Mileva
5
269 points to level up
@monika-mileva-3100
💎 Turning solo businesses into a 1 person AI-Native company that runs like a Fortune 500 without the teams, the big budgets or the overheads

Active 2h ago
Joined Aug 19, 2025
ENTP
Powered by